Traveling Sprinkler, by Nicholson Baker. I just finished this book, and I don’t know how to tell you about it. No, I do: it was like having a male relative, age 55, chat to you about everything he’s interested in, sometimes in such detail you wonder where he gets the self-assurance. But even though you are not particularly interested in those things (bassoons, Debussy, cigars, dance music, Quakers, drones), you find you need to sit by your computer while reading the book because you keep wanting to look things up. I listened to Debussy’s “The Sunken Cathedral.” I looked up bassoons and listened to them being played. I investigated what kind of liquor Tyrconnell is, and the next time I go to the liquor store I’m going to see how much it costs.

I would say I was kind of bored, reading it, and yet it made me interested in things—not just the things he describes, but things in general. It was pleasing to observe someone else being interested in things, even if I wasn’t interested in them myself. It made me want to be interested in things, too. And I really hoped his girlfriend would take him back.

I realized after reading the book that I’d read another by the author: The Fermata. It’s about a man who can stop time whenever he wants to. So what he does is, he uses this power to sneak into women’s houses, take their clothes off, and position their bodies and/or molest them. He considers this a loving, worshipful thing to do. I don’t remember much else about the book except that I was extremely annoyed and creeped out by it: I’d asked a male friend about his favorite books and he’d recommended this one, and I have written the end of this sentence half a dozen ways and how about if instead we just sit here for a minute and feel the hostile feelings welling up in our throats.

Anyway, that book was written twenty years before this one, when the author was more 35 than 55. I think 55 is working better for him, I’ll say THAT. Well, or working better for ME.

I dreamed last night that I was considering a new romance, and then in the dream I remembered that I hadn’t worried about sexually-transmitted diseases or birth control for quite some time and would need to go back to worrying about them right that second. It was a startling and educational dream, though disappointingly low on entertainment value.

I’m still thinking about the dream this morning—how I COULD get pregnant from an affair, and how I might not even REMEMBER that little fact until rather late in the game. I think I’d been thinking without realizing it that the reason I didn’t take the Pill anymore is that I was past being able to have children, rather than that Paul was past being able to have children.

It reminds me too of the sexually-transmitted-diseases part of my annual exam, when the doctor asks if I’m in a monogamous relationship. I don’t know how to answer that question in a way that doesn’t make it sound like I think my husband is cheating on me. But I also don’t want them to assume that an individual person can know for sure if her relationship is monogamous or not. Let’s be trusting in love but not in check-ups, Doctor.

I suppose the doctors are a bit trapped, since they could get a very bad reaction from any other assumption. My favorite obstetrician was the one who asked within the first few minutes if my husband was the father of the baby, but not everyone likes the idea that that question could even be asked. It can be difficult to see the difference between questions asked for moral reasons (“Are you a LOOSE WOMAN??” “Is your husband CHEATING ON YOU??”) and questions asked for medical reasons (“Could you have been exposed to sexually-transmitted diseases? could your spouse have been?” “Is your husband’s medical history applicable to this pregnancy?”).

And not every doctor asks these questions as if there’s a difference. I liked the obstetrician for asking the question, but even more I liked that he asked it as matter-of-factly as he’d asked for my date of birth—and as if the follow-up to an answer of “no, he’s not” would have been an equally matter-of-fact question about whether any of the father’s medical history was known. He didn’t care at all about my MORAL choices, he was only interested in their MEDICAL consequences.

Anyway. I never know how to answer. “I am in a relationship in which one of the rules is monogamy, yes.” “As far as I know, ha ha ha.” “Maybe this will be the day you find something that tells me I’m not! Wouldn’t that be weird?” “I’m monogamous, yes, but I can’t speak for my husband. Er, not that I think he’s having an affair. I mean, he could be! How would I know? What are the statistics now, amirite? Don’t skip that part of the exam just on MY say-so. But he hasn’t been acting suspiciously or anything.”

I have accidentally gotten into a funk. It started with McDonald’s discontinuing their Hot Mustard sauce, which is the only reason I eat there, and then they replied to my email on the topic by informing me that other customers preferred a different sauce and that they (McDonald’s) looked forward to serving me soon. Even though I’d just said I wouldn’t eat there anymore if there was no Hot Mustard sauce. They can look forward to serving those OTHER CUSTOMERS soon, I guess.

Then Paul and I tried to choose a paint color, and I realized that I hate not only all yellow paint colors but ALL paint colors.

Then I snapped at three children last night over things that were not at all snap-worthy, and after they went to bed I felt bad about it and thought, “I am making their lives hard.” Then I felt sorry for them in a way that was really more sorry for myself (imagining them as adults and how they’d remember me and how they’d describe me to others: “Well, I guess she did her best, but? Maybe she wasn’t really cut out to have children”), and then I felt even worse for turning pity for someone who’d actually been wronged into pity for someone who hadn’t. Then I resolved to DO SOMETHING about the snappishness rather than sitting there feeling bad about it afterward. Then I drew an analogy between that sort of resolution and the resolutions that come right after eating too much (resolutions which vanish as soon as hunger reappears), which led to anticipatory despair. I have done what I ought not to have done, and not done what I ought to have done, and there is much crabbiness in me.

This morning the coffee is backfiring and making me feel like I’m exhausted but can’t blink, and also irritable at being bothered while I’m trying to sleep. The day feels full of tasks I’ve done a million times before and still have to do millions of times before I’ll be done. And then I think, “Furthermore, according to those who have gone before, when I AM done I will MISS these tasks and feel sentimental about them.” This has already happened with the kindergarten drop-off process, which is a badly-organized, exasperating hassle and which I did for two years and which I couldn’t wait to be done with. Now I drive past as parents are dropping off their kindergartners and I think, “Aw.” EXACTLY AS IF I MISS IT. WHEN I KNOW FOR A FACT I CANNOT POSSIBLY MISS IT. I miss it the way a person might think, “Ug, I kind of wish I were home sick in bed, just reading and drinking cups of tea” until they actually ARE home sick in bed and thinking about how it’s impossible to remember how bad queasiness feels.

Paul and I are having a difference of creative opinion. We have agreed to paint the bathroom. We have agreed that we want yellow. We have agreed that we want a STRONG, BRIGHT, DELIBERATE yellow. This is where we part ways, at nearly-adjacent paint chips.

Paul looks at my paint chips, which are rich and deep and golden, and says, “Those are like, ‘We wanted yellow, but we chickened out.'” I look at his paint chips, which are like a crayon labeled Yellow, and say, “Those are like ‘kindergarten classroom.’ Those are ‘toy bin.’ I can already picture that color all scuffy from kindergartner shoes.” I hold up a yellow gumball insincerely and say “So, THIS is what you want?” “Yes,” says Paul sincerely.

“Remember when my mom chose a color she thought was Crayon Yellow, and on the walls it was acidic and eye-hurty and it ruined every photo taken in that room,” I remind. “*Shrug*,” says Paul. “If it has the name of a citrus fruit in it, I’m not using it—that means it’s too green/acidic,” I warn. “Okay,” says Paul, as if I will have it my own way, which is the wrong way. “I like the yellow on that box,” he says, pointing to a children’s shoe box in the paper recycling. I say that this proves my point about Kindergarten Yellow: the box contained children’s shoes, and is covered with faux kindergarten drawings. We color-match the box: the matching color is called Lemon Zest. It shares a paint category with colors that include the words “Olive” and “Grass.” TOO GREEN. I counter-offer a color called Macaw. Paul notes that another color in that category includes the word “Tangerine”: TOO ORANGE. (Also, he raises his eyebrows so I appreciate the presence of citrus fruit in my own chosen category.) Choosing a paint color is like loading a dishwasher.

We look at a card between his and mine. It does include a “Golden Green.” Also a “Pineapple.” We reminisce about a former co-worker of mine who insisted pineapple was a citrus fruit. “It’s not,” I say. “It’s not,” says Paul. “Acidic, yes,” I say; “Citrus, no,” finishes Paul. We have agreed on this before.

There is a color on this card called “Sun Ray,” which seems promising: earlier Paul asked where was the SUNSHINE yellow. “It’s a little ‘School Bus,'” I say. “It’s a little ‘School Bus,'” says Paul. One shade greener and we’re looking at “Bright Star” (the sun is a star!)—but it’s right next to Citrus; also colors containing the words “Leaves,” “Grass,” and “Moss.” TOO GREEN.

Two shades less green and we’re considering “Empire Yellow.” “Hm,” we both say. We click on the option to try it in a room, but the bathroom options look nothing like our bathroom. I mean, seriously:

(image from Behr.com)

There is a HUGE difference between using that color in a large room with acres of uninterrupted wall space and using it in a room with little snippets of wall showing here and there.

But that’s YELLOW, by god. That doesn’t say “We wanted yellow but we chickened out.” Does it say “School bus”? Maybe. WHAT’S WRONG WITH SCHOOL BUSES, we wonder? Plus, THIS is a school bus:

TOTALLY DIFFERENT.

I was able to complete the research for this post VERY RAPIDLY.

(See also: Which Pieces Are in the See’s Candies Chocolate and Variety Box?
Which Pieces Are in the See’s Candies Soft Centers Box?
Which Pieces Are in the See’s Candies Assorted Chocolates Box?)

I’m evaluating the See’s assortment boxes to see if I like the included pieces enough to be worth saving $4.00-$4.50/pound over a custom mix. The last three have both been no: it made more sense to get the Custom Mix, especially since the Custom Mix boxes tend to be a bit heavier than a pound.

Now I’m trying the Milk Chocolates box. Here’s the description: “Enjoy soft buttercream, crispy molasses wafers, creamy caramel and beyond, all generously coated in our classic, irresistible milk chocolate. Includes Bordeaux™, Butterscotch Square, Caramel, Vanilla Nut Cream, Cocoanut, Almond Square and more.” There’s almost no chance this box will end up being a good value for me; I just got caught up in the fun of it, and also I’m curious: I want to know ALL THE PIECES.

Here are the pieces in the box (more info on what each piece is like can be found on the Custom Mix page):

Almond Square (2)
Butterscotch Square (2)
California Brittle
Caramel (2)
Chelsea
Divinity
Mayfair
Milk Almond (2)
Milk Bordeaux
Milk Butterchew (2)
Milk Chocolate Butter (2)
Milk Cocoanut
Milk Molasses Chip (3)
Milk Walnut
Mocha
Rum Nougat (2)
Vanilla Nut Cream (2)

Of those seventeen types, six are ones I would order for sure in a custom mix. Two are ones I really like but might not think to order, and so would be especially pleased to see in an assortment. Five are ones I think are okay; two more I think are kind of meh. And two I actively dislike and would give to Paul. (I don’t specify which are which, because it’s personal tastes/preference only: it’s not that I think some pieces are objectively higher or lower quality.) So for me, this box was good to try but not as good a value as a custom-mix box.

Additional notes:

1. I am almost always disappointed by unnecessary duplication in an assortment box. Why TWO chocolate creams when there are no vanilla, orange, or strawberry creams? I think I was puzzled about this with another box, too, that had, like, three raspberry truffles but none of the other fruit truffles. Diversification is the best part of a mixed box of chocolate. DIVERSIFY IT UP.

2. I’d thought of Caramel (chocolate-covered caramel with almonds) as being in the “okay” category, but after two pieces of it this time, I’d bump it up to the “really like but might not think to order” category. See, you DO have to try things ten times to see if you like them! (*orders ten more boxes*) Also, I would have used the name “Caramel” to describe the piece they call Milk Butterchew (chocolate-covered caramel), and I would have named the one with almonds something that sounds more like it has almonds in it. The name “Caramel” almost seems to specify NOT almonds.

It took a week and a half, but I found the way to explain Crohn’s Disease to Edward (and the other kids): “Your immune system is attacking your digestive system. It’s not supposed to, and no one knows why it’s doing it.” There! *brushes off hands*

Oh, wait, now I have to explain something else? Fine. “This medication is supposed to make your immune system relax so that it will stop attacking your digestive system so much. But the only way to do that is to tell the immune system to relax about ALL attacking. So your immune system is also relaxing about attacking germs and viruses. That’s why I said you have to wash your hands before AND after picking your nose.”

I had a little crisis yesterday when we picked up Edward’s new medication and saw that one of the potential side effects is a rare, rapid, fatal cancer. People and literature say, “YOU know what’s best for your child,” but actually I have no idea. How would I know? In fact, THINKING one knows what’s best for someone else is one of the classic plot lines of tragic literature. And do we think of our own parents as being the ones who know what’s best for us?

Here is the way in which it’s true I know what’s best for Edward: I know he often doesn’t really hear things the first time, so I know I need to repeat things and/or get confirmation from him that he’s understood. I know he has even more trouble understanding things if it’s a stranger talking to him, so I know it’s better if I can accompany him to things such as the MRI, to re-state for him each thing the technician says. I also know that if he is having trouble choking down a food or medicine, he really will barf it up if he forces it. This is the type of way in which I “know what’s best” for Edward. Note that even this category is pretty thoroughly dicey: maybe what would be best for Edward is if I STOPPED interpreting/repeating for him, so that he would get used to hearing things without my help; maybe what would be best for Edward is if I stopped trying to make him eat vegetables.

Here is the way in which it’s definitely NOT true I know what’s best for Edward: I don’t know if a medicine is the best one for him, or not. The doctor doesn’t know that either. Neither do any of my friends and family; neither do you. THE ENTIRE SCIENTIFIC/MEDICAL/HEALTH/PEOPLE COMMUNITY DOES NOT KNOW THIS INFORMATION. NONE of us will know until we try it and it either works, or doesn’t, or does something awful. The extent to which any of us BELIEVE we know it ahead of time (or believe afterward that we DID know it) is not correlated to the actual fact of us knowing it. The extent to which the medicine makes any of us nervous is not correlated to its effectiveness or lack thereof, or to the rightness/wrongness of a decision; believing it IS correlated is also uncorrelated.

But beliefs still enter into this HUGELY. There are entire branches of treatment options that I consider complete hooey when I have no reason to consider using those branches of treatment and have nothing at stake. Do I still think they’re hooey now that the patient is my own irreplaceable child? So far: yes. But we’re about 5 minutes into this process. Plenty a person who starts out on one branch ends up dedicating their life to Spreading Awareness after things go wrong.

********

Normally when I bring up a topic, I assume I’m bringing it up for discussion: if I didn’t want to discuss it with other people, I would leave it inside my head where I could discuss it with only myself. Today I’m overwhelmed and all over the place after reading the brochure that comes with a medication (see also: the brochure that comes with almost any medication) and then hearing “Oh, don’t give your child those DANGEROUS TOXIC POISONS! Instead try something you’ve always believed to be absolute hooey!” from someone I’d thought was going to give a very different kind of advice. Also, it’s been a week and a half since we got the diagnosis, and apparently that is about how long it takes me to absorb news.

In short, I am feeling tender and touchy and upset—not an ideal state of mind for discussions. I ate three-quarters of a pound of See’s chocolates yesterday, and I assure you that was the minimum therapeutic dose. So if you’ll allow this presumption, I’d like to GUIDE the discussion more than usual—not to make you feel nervous that anything you say will be the wrong thing, though that seems like an inevitable side effect for people as empathetic and considerate as we are, but more to clarify things ahead of time. The way a friend might arrive at the coffee shop and say, “Heads up: I have PMS, and the baby only let me sleep 2 hours last night, and I had a fight with my JERKHOLE husband right before I came here, so I might be a Bit Cranky,” and you might think to yourself, “Okay, so this would be a GOOD day to insist on doughnuts with our coffee and tell that funny story and have a little vent about spouses, and a BAD day to ask for real marriage advice or to mention the extremely irritating customer service I got the other day or to offer an opinion about the importance of treasuring every moment.”

Anyway, so I’ve come marching into the coffee shop already talking a blue streak, and I realize the topic may SEEM to be “Weigh in on what you think we should do with Edward’s treatment and/or give me alternatives to what the doctor is suggesting” or “Reassure me that I DO know what I’m doing, and that anything that makes me nervous is The Wrong Decision” or “Argue with me about how beliefs relate to reality”—but those are in fact the things that have gotten me all worked up, so although they may be good topics for another day after more mental processing has taken place, they are not good topics for right this minute.

The topic is more like “It’s so hard to know what to do for one’s child, and so hard to collect information when the information is large and group-based but the child is individual, and so upsetting and unhelpful to hear that we DO know when we really DON’T, and so upsetting to be reminded that these awful potential side effects really do happen to real people, and so odd to think about how belief systems do/don’t change based on life circumstances, and so weird to have life circumstances change like this, and so upsetting to feel like anything I choose could potentially be Absolutely Wrong and that then it will be All My Fault.”

Or doughnuts. Doughnuts are a good topic. Or things that comfort you to think of when you are in a similar tizz. (Right now I’m using “Yes, it is horrible that bad things really do happen to real people. But nothing horrible is happening to US right NOW, so there is no need to vividly imagine what it would be like if it WERE,” plus a concept along the lines of waiting to look under the bandage until a little more time has passed, plus the self-administered-medication-only concept of thinking of how many other families at the children’s hospital would want to trade places with us.) Or stories about how something scary worked out perfectly fine, like how my gut was sending me the message that Elizabeth’s tonsillectomy would result in certain fatality, and yet it went perfectly fine. Or general agreement about how life is horrible and hard and we all die no matter what we do.

It is perhaps a little odd to segue from Lifelong Incurable Disease Diagnosis to Dr. Who Scarf, but that is how things go.

Here is the situation: William would like to knit himself a Dr. Who scarf. We have not even WATCHED the fourth doctor (we started at the ninth), but he is acting a little rabid about it anyway. Not only is he currently interested in all Dr. Who stuff, but also a cool high school boy in his Dr. Who Fan Club has such a scarf. HE WANTS THE SCARF.

There are TONS of instructional thingies online, but as my mother (our knitting consultant) noted, the results seem….dissimilar to the original scarf. Like, first we see a picture of Dr. Who wearing a long, thin, woven-not-knit scarf, and then we see the tutorial-writer wearing what looks like a full-body blanket/shawl.

One issue, I think, is that the Doctor seems to wear his scarf doubled or even tripled over on itself: someone trying to duplicate the measurements of the actual scarf might make a 14-inch wide scarf, but then it doesn’t look the same because they’re wearing it flat open instead of almost rolled up.

Also, it seems that the scarf changes several times during the fourth Doctor’s tenure, so both knit and woven are represented.

Here are my questions:

1. Do you know, is one scarf considered more legitimate/representative than the others?

2. How…fervent…might a Doctor Who fan feel about the accuracy of a homemade version? That is, could a person capture the SPIRIT of the scarf by making it narrow in order to approximate the OVERALL LOOK of a scarf that is much wider but is of a different fabric and has been sort of rolled up? Must the scarf be the same number of feet long as the Doctor’s own scarf, or may it be made to work on the height of the person wearing it (while still being, of course, massively over-long)?

We could likely answer these questions ourselves by watching several seasons of the fourth Doctor, but we are a bit pressed for time as the urgent need for a scarf has overtaken someone to the point that he talks of almost nothing else. I could also research it online, but I’m worried about getting misinformation and not realizing it because I haven’t watched the fourth Doctor myself and so wouldn’t know the difference between actual information and someone’s mom who thinks she knows what she’s talking about but doesn’t. I’m hoping this is one of those Access the Hive Mind situations the internet is so good for.

[Edited to add: My mom found this one, and it’s our favorite so far: wittylittleknitter.com]

I was away a day and then sick a day, and boy, there is nothing quite like that to make a person feel that special blend of useful/important (“My goodness, I really DO do a lot around here!”) and resentful (“So, it’s LITERALLY that if I don’t do it no one does??”). It’s also given me a couple of days of morbid-fantasy fretting about how the family would cope if I were incapacitated for longer than a couple of days and also about how I’ll fare in my elder years. Well, sufficient unto the day, etc.

Speaking of sufficient unto the day, we have a diagnosis for Edward. To review before the reveal, he was diagnosed with anemia at age 6 and referred to a pediatric hematologist at age 8. The pediatric hematologist (billing $750 for 20 minutes, which, my dear heaven, my insurance card is now covered in lipstick marks) referred him to the pediatric gastroenterologist. The pediatric gastroenterologist first did an endoscopy/colonoscopy and then an abdominal MRI, with me all pre-embarrassed for how this was all going to turn out to be nothing and look how much trouble and expense we caused for a little anemia issue.

But instead it’s Crohn’s Disease (a disease that can include the entire digestive system from In to Out), and we’re so glad we found out as early as we did: some people find out they have Crohn’s after it’s caused them to miss an important growth spurt, or at the point where they need a large piece of damaged intestine removed. Edward has lost some growth (the anemia was diagnosed after he failed to grow at all between age 5 and age 6), but we hope this nice early treatment will help him not to miss more. The diagnosis explains his anemia, his irregular growth, his tiredness, his picky eating, his low appetite, his stomachaches: Crohn’s can make it difficult to absorb nutrients, and difficult to digest food and to feel good while doing so. Crohn’s is not curable but it’s treatable; he’s started on Pentasa (this is nine capsules a day) and omeprazole, plus two weeks of prednisone, and he’ll likely start on 6-MP at his visit next month.

I don’t know much about Crohn’s at all, though that situation is rapidly changing. Paul got us a book out of the library and it’s causing me to do childbirth breathing. Also, Crohn’s can be quite hereditary, so I’m also worrying about future grandchildren. I’m trying to take to heart Augusten Burroughs’s advice (from This Is How, which I see is currently bargain-priced and which I highly recommend: it’s like having someone ELSE go to three decades of therapy and condense it for you so you don’t have to go), where he says that just because someone has an illness that COULD involve certain things, don’t worry about those things until they happen, because if/when they DO happen, you’ll take it in stride in a way you can’t do when thinking of it ahead of time. OKAY I WILL TRY.

(image from Amazon.com)

The Husband’s Secret, by Liane Moriarty. I started this book, but gave up just as I started the second chapter. The gimmicks INSTANTLY bothered me: drawn-out mystery, switching storylines at a cliff-hanger, starting a new storyline in a way that deliberately makes the reader wait a page or two to know what on earth is going on. Plus, there was lots of irritating exposition: we’re reading about a woman wondering whether or not she should open the “in case of my death” letter she found written by her husband (who is not dead but is on a business trip), but the author is using the scene to explain to us in a distracting, noticeable way what the main character and her life are like. Why not go all the way and have her look in a mirror in order to describe her hair and eyes?

But then my mom read it, and she said I should give it another chance. She assured me that the drawn-out mystery was worthwhile (I’d have placed a money bet that it would be drama for the sake of drama, followed by a disappointing reveal) and not overly drawn-out, and that the book hit its stride pretty soon. And I DID give it another try, and I DID like it. Very much! Very, VERY much! So!

I did strongly object to the amazing number of times a size-18 woman was referred to as “morbidly obese” and considered wayyyyy too fat for anyone to ever be interested in her—the kind of fat where she’d walk into a room and people would stare and whisper and giggle. It made me think of those web sites where people send photos of what “size 18” or “200 pounds” actually looks like at various heights and on various body types, to counteract the weird impressions society has about what the numbers look like.

It’s a Maeve-Binchy-like book, in that there are several interlocking storylines. When I was describing the book to someone else, it sounded soap-opera-y (hardly anyone in real life has SO VERY MANY dramatic things happen to them), but it didn’t seem that way when I was reading it. Instead I came away with a fresh dose of that slightly jaw-dropped understanding that these dramatic things really do happen to real people.

There are several Quite Sad scenes involving children and parental grief. I found I was able to bear it, but it was a close call and I did some skimming. There were a lot of scenes where a character was thinking in a way I recognized, which gave me that happy bonding feeling you get when someone’s thought processes are very similar to your own. Things are tied up nicely at the end (not entirely, but enough), and there’s some Omniscient Narrator stuff of the sort I enjoy. I was always very eager to get back to the book, and I thought about it a lot when I was reading it and also afterward.

(image from Amazon.com)

I would have said I didn’t want to read EVEN ONE MORE coming-of-age novel about a teenaged boy, but I was wrong. (I think what I actually want is to never hear another novel about a teenager referred to as a coming-of-age novel.) I added Blind Sight, by Meg Howrey to my library list on Meredith‘s recommendation, and I loved it so much I’m reluctant to recommend it, because what if you don’t like it? Also because it’s a teenaged-boy coming-of-age novel so there are a lot of embarrassing sexual references in it.

I generally don’t like books written as letters or as essays or whatever, but I thought this one pulled it off (and it’s only PART essays). When I was reading the first page or two I thought, “Hmmmm….I don’t think I’m going to like this…” but I very quickly changed my mind. I thought it ended up working great, in fact: a way to see the main character as he saw himself in addition to how the author described him.

I liked the basic story (teenaged boy meets father for the first time), but what I MOSTLY liked were the boy’s thoughts and observations and the way he expressed them, and the way the characters acted and talked. I kept saying to Paul, “I can’t believe how much I like this. This is just exactly my kind of book.”

At the end, I was disappointed to be left hanging on an issue or two. I wanted MORE. I think there needs to be a sequel.