Last night I told Paul that we need to talk about two things: (1) what to name the baby, and (2) where to put it. He starting groaning and complaining immediately. He hates planning ahead.
I realize we don’t have to make rooming decisions right this second. The baby will sleep in a bassinet out in the living room for awhile, and there are plenty of temporary measures we can take after that. After the twins were born, we had all four children in one bedroom for awhile. It seemed ridiculous to even consider doing it that way, and yet it worked fine: when the two new bedrooms we added down in the basement were finished, we didn’t even rush to move anyone down there. (Now Rob and William have those two new rooms, and the twins share the upstairs room.)
I think there’s this feeling that each child should have his or her own room–and, failing that, there shouldn’t be more than two children in a room, clearly. But if you do it a different way it doesn’t actually end up being as big a deal as it seems like it will be. People would say, “So, did you put the twins in the same room or do they each have their own?,” and I’d say, “Oh, uh, actually all four children are in the same room,” and they’d react as if I’d said we had an outhouse. I can see it myself, because when we realized we needed to temporarily implement the one-room plan, I felt as if we might as well put the kids in large dog kennels in the hallway.
Anyway. I was saying that I know it isn’t as if when the new baby arrives we all have to be in our perfect shining places with everything the way it will be forever and ever; we’ll have time to change things around. It’s more that if I get to choose between packing up and moving rooms around now or in five months when I have a newborn, two toddlers, and two older kids out of school for the summer, I choose now.
I got him to do 10 seconds’ work on the name choice. I handed him the list of the seven names we’re considering so far (Alan, Charlie, Henry, Leo, Oliver, Elliot, Miles) and asked him to rank them 1-7. Then I modified it and said that if names were of the same rank, he could mark them together: 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, or whatever. Here’s how he ranked them:
1: Henry, Elliot, Miles
2: Leo, Oliver
3: Alan, Charlie
That’s not as bad as I was expecting. I was thinking we’d be exactly opposite, but we’re close. I would have ranked them like this (and feel free to rank them yourself in the comment section, if that seems fun):
1: Leo, Oliver
2: Henry, Elliot, Charlie
3: Alan, Miles
So he has one 1st-choice name that is in my “I’m not seriously considering these” slot, and that’s as bad as it gets. I’d worried that he still thought Leo wasn’t a possibility. I’m leaning more toward Oliver at this point (Oliver Henry, that’s kind of nice), but I don’t want to rule out Leo.
Incidentally, how would you spell Elliot? I would spell it “Elliot.” Paul would spell it “Eliot.” And there’s also “Elliott” to consider.