I keep thinking, “WHY am I so cheesed and sad and weighed-down-with-the-cares-of-the-world-ish over NOTHING??”—and then I remember, it’s not nothing: Paul is sick. It reflects the depth of my love and commitment that I do not put the word sick in quotes.

He has a cold. It is the same cold the rest of us have had. So he has dropped completely out of household chores, and in fact has gone past the “not helping” line and into the “putting his dishes on the counter instead of into the dishwasher right below it” zone. I suppose I should be grateful for the heroic effort it took him to unselfishly choke down sustenance and then to drag his dishes allllll the way to the counter, when after all he has a SORE THROAT and FEELS KIND OF TIRED.

Furthermore, one of the kids got an ear infection, and the VERY MINUTE that child said his ear hurt, you will never guess: PAUL’S ear started hurting! And when I took the child to the doctor the next day and the ear infection was officially diagnosed, Paul realized he had now been feeling sick for THREE WHOLE DAYS and HE needed a doctor appointment TOO. The level of woundedness he displayed when I suggested that grown-ups wait to go to the doctor until they have something the doctor can treat, rather than going when they feel kind of icky and want extra sympathy and drama and fuss made over them…. Well, let’s not discuss it. This topic always going to be a touchy spot in our marriage.

I genuinely worry that as he ages he will get some sort of long-term or chronic illness, because then I would be bound by the terms of our contract to deal with it. Which reminds me once again of the loophole.

I got off on the wrong foot in two ways this morning:

1. I was sure, SURE, it was the weekend. I woke at 4:45 and thought about it happily. I woke up again when Paul got up, and I thought, “Ahhhhh, now he will take care of any kid that wakes up, and I will get sleep.” Then Paul came back from his shower and turned on the light, and I was first outraged (“WHY IS HE DOING THIS TO ME ON A WEEKEND??”) and then appalled (“IT IS IN FACT TUESDAY AARRRRRGGGGGGGGG NOOOOOOOOOoooooooo”).

2. I was dreaming that I was packing up to leave someone else’s house after a stay. It was that part of packing where it’s like, “WHY did we think it made sense to bring so much STUFF?” and “Oh no, MORE shoes??” and “Shoot, I forgot this pile of dirty laundry. I need a plastic bag or something to put it in,” and “This is never going to all fit back in the suitcase” and “I just know we’re going to forget something.” It went on like that for an hour or so of dream time.

********

I think I am going to have to rewatch Thirtysomething (Netflix link), now that I am in my thirties. The last time I watched it, I was in my EARLY TWENTIES. I was not married, I had no children, and I was watching it in reruns on daytime television, or on videotapes (VIDEOTAPES) after work. So. Things have changed a bit since then.

I think I might have a different feeling about how EXOTIC it is, now. Maybe it’ll be like magazines, where a magazine called Seventeen is actually aimed at 12-year-olds; and where Cosmo, which acts like it’s a magazine for grown glamorous professional single women living in the glamorous city, is actually aimed at high school and college girls. Maybe Thirtysomething is for earlytwentysomethings who want to feel like they’re getting a peek into their own future—but maybe it would be depressing and unrealistic and eye-roll-y for thirtysomethings who have already seen that future.

I am feeling cheerful today. I credit many things, but here are a few things I’ve thought of today with particular cheer:

1. Bird earrings. I got these at Target back in August. I wasn’t even going to buy them, but I had William with me and he was making the bird be all cute and hop around and look me in the eye and so forth, so I bought them. The next day I went back and bought more pairs to give as gifts.

hop, hop

buy me

2. Store-brand Moose Tracks ice cream. I was complaining on Twitter that I was disappointed in all the Breyer’s specialty flavors that looked so good but didn’t measure up, and Doing My Best said her store brand’s Moose Tracks was really, really superior. I have enough faith in her ice cream judgement to get a box of my own store-brand Moose Tracks, even though it was unlikely to be the same store brand. (But I remember reading somewhere that a lot of store brands are filled by the same manufacturer, so I had hope.) IT IS SO DELICIOUS. I’ve had two boxes of it now, and I didn’t buy more on this last shopping trip because I’d made myself feel sick having “just a little more” of the last box—and now I regret not getting it. I could be making myself feel sick RIGHT THIS MINUTE on tiny peanut butter cups and fudge (not fudge SAUCE, but FUDGE).

3. Pink zinnias.

A patch of some vegetable in the garden failed to thrive, so Paul pulled it up. Then he impulsively put a pack of zinnia seeds over that patch, and they succeeded to thrive. GOODNESS, didn’t they! And they seem to last way longer than they should in a vase. (That “vase” is an empty bottle from one of those frappuccino drinks they sell in four-packs. They make great vases.) Next year we’re going to grow assorted-color zinnias.

4. Snyder’s Chedder Cheese Pretzel Pieces.

It’s like someone broke a bunch of big pretzels into chunks and pieces, and then dusted them with an intoxicating cheese powder—similar to Cheetos powder or Kraft mac-and-cheese powder, and just a LITTLE bit spicy. SO YUMMY. Paul wrinkled his nose at the sight of them; then took one and ate it suspiciously; then took several more and watched the bag longingly as I took it away. MINE.

…I’m going to have to get a little bowl of them to eat while I write the rest of this.

5. Light pink Converse One-Star.

They are looking kind of grubby because I wore them pretty much every day all summer. They were an impulse purchase (70% off at Target, should I get them?, no, yes, no, yes, no, well I’ll just put them in the cart and think about it, okay I can always return them) and I LOVE THEM. I bought a second pair in orchid (a medium-light purpley color) but I haven’t worn those yet.

6. Prell.

Paul was out of shampoo, and he was trying very hard to work up the enthusiasm to respond to my incredibly boring questions about whether he’d been happy with that kind or did he want to try something new. He said the only time he’d ever had any sort of shampoo preference was when it was Prell, and that was just because it was fun to watch the bubble go up and down in the bottle. Good enough for me, and I enjoy a quest.

Target didn’t have it, so I checked our grocery store, which seems to cater to “people complaining that they can’t find such-and-such anymore.” Sure enough, they had it. I think it’s amusing that there’s a picture of a bubble on the bottle, like Prell KNOWS that’s how we all think of it. It’s fun to be using the same shampoo we both used in our childhoods.

My two favorite pairs of jeans gave up the good fight at the end of last spring, and my remaining jeans, purchased in desperation, were making feel frumpy, ugly, old, and ridiculous. That is quite an accomplishment for a single item of clothing. I changed into pedal pushers it was too chilly for, got rid of the bad jeans in a bold “I don’t even have replacements yet, but I will wear pedal pushers in snowdrifts rather than ever wear those jeans again” move, and went shopping.

Here are the things I don’t like about Lane Bryant:

1. They are the kind of store that has the kind of sales that mean you can never buy anything at regular price. If something consistently goes on 50%-off sales, that means the regular price is not a reasonable price to pay.

2. They are the kind of store that covers a table in piles of jeans, and puts “$29.99 jeans!!” on a big sign with an asterisk leading to “select styles.” And it turns out that 1/5th of the jeans on the table qualify, plus one style on another rack covered mostly in non-qualifying styles. And there’s no way to find out which jeans qualify without having a clerk take each pair over to the register and check.

3. I’m between two sizes there AND between two inseams there. So my choices are “too tight and too long,” “too tight and too short,” “too loose and too long,” or “too loose and too short.” I go with “too tight and too long,” because (1) their jeans tend to stretch out quite a bit, and (2) I’d rather step on or roll my cuffs than have them floating over my shoes. (Accept my assurances that “You could get them hemmed” is an idea I am able to come up with independently.)

4. They have signs up all over that if the store doesn’t have your size in stock, you can get free shipping from the site. That’s an awesome idea, and compensates me for the frustration of coming all the way here and not being able to buy something they should have had in stock! …But it turns out it’s free shipping TO THE STORE. That is not “free shipping,” that is “the store ordering something they needed more of, and I’ll need to come back another day to buy them.”

But here is why I shop there with happiness in my heart, despite the damning case I seem to have constructed against them:

1. They make me feel like I’m a normal person who falls into the normal range of human anatomy.

It’s hard to beat that kind of service.

I can go into the store, and there are things on every single rack that fit me. Sometimes I try something on and it’s too big, and I need to get a smaller size; sometimes it’s too small, and a larger size is available. I can come out of the dressing room and stand in front of the big mirror and lift up my shirt to see how the waistband of the jeans looks, and I don’t feel self-conscious about it: I feel like this is just the size and shape I am. I can try things on and reject them because I don’t like the style or color, rather than because “Why is this an XXL and I can’t even get it over my knees?? How big does this store think an ‘extra, EXTRA large’ person IS??”

Furthermore, the items I’m trying on will conform to current trends. Maybe they do a little more with sequins than the average store, but there’s a “Hey, I am someone who has some flash and glamor and isn’t trying to hide in dumpy baggy monochrome clothes!” feeling to it, rather than an “I’m hoping to distract your eye from my plumpness” feeling. If everyone is wearing skinny jeans and I’m starting to feel flappy-pantsed in my flare cuffs, I can go to Lane Bryant and know that they will have skinny jeans. Maybe I will not BUY any skinny jeans (I did not buy any skinny jeans), but I know I CAN if I WANT to. And if they don’t have them in my size, they will order them, and I can come back another day and get them.

I had a dental cleaning/check yesterday, which means that from September 1st when I flipped the calendar page and saw the appointment, until yesterday when I was walking out the dentist’s door, you wouldn’t have been able to convince me the world was a happy place. Now I feel open to the concept.

Whenever I go to the dentist or have an appointment in the near future, it sets off a smoldering annoyance I feel with a whole category of…stuff. Things. Now comes the challenging part, where I try to say what that category IS.

Okay, it’s like this. Let’s picture the WORLD, for a moment. The whole world. And now let’s picture a Dental Spectrum, representing the dental care levels of the world. At one end, we’re going to have no tooth care at all, and adults with many missing teeth. No dentist, but maybe some local guy who will pull a tooth for you when it’s hurting.

One step up from that is going to be people who figure out a sort of self-care for their teeth: scrubbing them with sand and twigs or something. Still no dentist.

One step up from that is going to be a situation where you can buy the things you need: toothpaste, toothbrushes, floss. Maybe at that point in the spectrum there’s a dentist, but maybe he’s 30 miles away by foot, or maybe he’s a traveling guy who only stops by every couple of years and anyway he still only does basic, basic stuff. No, like, root canals or crowns.

One step up from that…. Well, I don’t think we need to do every single step. But here is what causes the smoldering annoyance: picturing the other end of the spectrum, the last tiny smidgen pressed right up against the far edge, where we have such things as “Making one’s teeth WHITE enough” and “Making one’s teeth STRAIGHT enough” and “Going to see the dentist every 6 months at great expense, whether you need it or not, or else you are unclean and irresponsible.”

Those things are all crowded up ALMOST at the tippy-edge of the spectrum, right before the Hollywood part where it’s “Getting all your teeth capped, and it has to be a special expensive KIND of cap.” And yet we’re supposed to think of this crazy-high level of care as STANDARD and MINIMUM.

It’s the same with fashion. Picture the world again, and now picture the fashion spectrum instead of the dental one. At one end we have just enough clothes for pure safety/use/protection: a little cloth to prevent pain and flopping, maybe. Something on the feet if absolutely necessary. An animal skin when it’s cold enough to otherwise die of exposure.

Then it’s clothes for privacy and comfort. But it’s whatever can be obtained: certainly fit is not an issue, or color, or style, or number of holes, or matching, or ANYTHING like that. And it’s probably one shirt, one pair of pants held up with rope—not, like, multiples of each item.

Then let’s skip to wayyyyyyyy up at the other end of the spectrum, it’s “Clothes must fit AND flatter AND be this season AND be appropriately accessorized AND be quality AND be expensive, AND you have to get rid of them all and start over in three months or else EEW. I mean, take CARE of yourself, amirite?”

Those things are all crowded up at the farthest edge of the spectrum, right before the Hollywood part where it’s “And never wear the same item twice” and “No, seriously, it’s completely reasonable for a dress to cost multiple thousands of dollars”—and yet we’re supposed to think of them as STANDARD and MINIMUM.

Oh, and feet. FEET. (I remember reading somewhere, like in a novel where some characters were old-timey high society, that the word “foot” was acceptable and the word “feet” was vulgar. Isn’t that funny?) The world’s foot spectrum appears before us; at one end, no footwear at all. Then it’s any shoes available, certainly no quibbling about size, appearance, style. Etc., etc., I’m sure you’re getting the concept, and then we get to the upper part, where you must have pedicures or else you’re gross and an offense to society, AND you must have many pairs of shoes, AND they must be custom-fit to your feet by an expert, AND they must be this season, AND they must be perfect in both color and style with your outfit and purse, AND it is perfectly reasonable for them to cost multiple hundreds of dollars.

I mistyped and then misread “foot” as “food,” so yes, let’s talk food. World food spectrum, starting with “Trying not to die.” A BIG step up the spectrum, and then it’s “Trying to get adequate nutrition so that one’s teeth don’t fall out and one’s bones don’t snap.” Another big step and we’re at “Being able to buy food at a store” and “Being able to choose between foods” and “Having access to food that is mostly still fresh/bugless.”

Then let’s look at the verrrrrry top edge of the spectrum, where it’s “The food has to be FRESH” and “The food has to be LOCAL” and “The food has to be ORGANIC” and “The food has to be a CERTAIN BRAND and/or from a CERTAIN STORE and/or sold in a CERTAIN KIND OF PACKAGING.” It’s right below the very top edge where people spend multiple hundreds of dollars on a bottle of BEVERAGE to go WITH their meal, but it’s supposed to be considered STANDARD and MINIMUM. Anything less is GROSS and IRRESPONSIBLE and DANGEROUS.

And what really starts turning the smolder into something more volcanic is that these spectrums cover EVERY SINGLE AREA OF LIFE. Everything. Down to our TOENAILS. Up to our HAIR, which must be not just in existence AND clean, but also cut regularly, by a professional, ideally an expensive professional, and also cared for with a variety of expensive products and tools for a long period of time each day, AND colored every 6 weeks, AND worn fashionably, AND EXISTING NOWHERE ELSE ON OUR BODIES.

And home maintenance! And yard maintenance! And pet care! Eye care! Eyebrow maintenance! Love relationships! Exercise! Housecleaning! Parenting! Car ownership and care! Optional insurance! Appliances! EVERYTHING must be obtained and maintained at the 99TH PERCENTILE or else it is CRAP. DO IT ALL, OR YOU ARE A CRAPPY AND IRRESPONSIBLE HUMAN BEING WHO JUST DOESN’T CARE AND/OR IS TOO STUPID TO KNOW ANY BETTER. OH AND BY THE WAY IT ALL COSTS A LOT OF MONEY, BUT HAVING LESS MONEY IS NO EXCUSE.

These are terrible ways to measure human worth—and yet there they are, totally in place, and established so that people feel comfortable referring to them as givens.

Oh, I know, the answer is to just DISREGARD these silly standards and make my OWN decisions about what is worthwhile and important and valuable! Yes, yes, thank you, Buddha Jr.! But we do LIVE on this planet, constantly exposed to these standards, and it puts me on a constant low smolder to be reminded of them so persistently and from so many different directions. I don’t even like those standards to EXIST; and so since other people ARE applying them, it helps only a little to remind myself that I don’t have to do so.

(photo from Amazon.com)

10 Items or Less (Netflix link). I was completely charmed by this movie. COMPLETELY CHARMED. I think Netflix recommended it to me, and I was like, “Eh, I do like Morgan Freeman, so okay.” And then I really, really liked it. Morgan Freeman plays himself, which is fun, and there are cameos by other actors. He forms this affectionate, non-sexual, out-of-nowhere buddy relationship with a supermarket clerk, and…that’s pretty much it. But I really liked it. I think you might like it too.

(photo from Amazon.com)

The Station Agent (Netflix link). This is the perfect movie for three thoughts: (1) “OMG. We are all just PEOPLE, in different-looking bodies!! We’re all just PEOPLE!! Hey, everybody! We’re ALL PEOPLE WE ALL FEEL BASICALLY THE SAME ON THE INSIDE!!” and (2) “So THIS is how friendships work! You don’t have to BE a certain WAY, you can just BE how you ARE!” and (3) “Whooo. Peter Dinklage is…ATTRACTIVE.”

(photo from Amazon.com)

Becoming Chaz (Netflix link). This is the story of how Chastity Bono became Chaz Bono, and it was a great and cathartic-cry peek into what someone else’s life is like. I ended up feeling split between “OH GOD WHY DOES LIFE HAVE TO BE SO HARD???” and “Isn’t it great that people ARE the way they ARE, and aren’t they WONDERFUL?” (see also: The Station Agent). There’s medical stuff you might have been curious about, and there’s emotional/relationshipal things you might have been curious about; the whole thing ends up feeling the normal way things feel when they happen to you instead of to strangers. The portrayal of Chaz’s girlfriend is masterful, I thought: they show her dingbat side, AND they make you love and respect her and see why someone would really treasure her. Also, you get to hear Oprah deciding that SHE is going to call documentaries “real life stories,” and imply that she invented the concept.

I put this on Twitter, and then I was like, “Self, why did you put that on Twitter? First of all, it took EIGHT tweet installments to say it. That is not the point of Twitter, self. Secondly, now it scrolls down and disappears forever, and then next year when you’re thinking, ‘Where is that thing I wrote about this??,’  you will search all your blog archives and be completely mystified because WHERE DID IT GO? And I will not be here to say, ‘You put it on TWITTER, dummy.'”

So I will write it here again, even though this will be a bit dull for those who already saw it on Twitter already. We will all suffer together, but only briefly, and next time I will try to remember to write it here to begin with, so that we can write or read it ONCE.

Here is what happened: Several people on Twitter were talking about how their schools wanted them to write a reassuring note to their children, to pack in an emergency preparedness kit. Then we all died from the agony of facing that task. The end.

One particularly wrenching thought was that if it’s a big emergency, this could be THE LAST COMMUNICATION YOUR CHILD EVER GETS FROM YOU. This is too much pressure for a note, I think we can agree on that. This just BEGS parents to start making lengthy, sobbing lists of everything they would want to tell their child if this was their last chance, and I think we can further agree that the resulting note is not going to be reassuring to a child.

So as I was lying awake night after night having horrified thoughts about this whole thing, I came up with two goals:

1. The note needs to reassure the child without going overboard/crazy, in the situations where it is mostly likely the note will be used: a bomb scare where there is no bomb, a tornado alert where the tornado does not arrive.

2. The note needs to still work if the child will, unthinkably, be treasuring this note forever.

Here is what I would write:

Dear Henry,

Hello from Mommy! This is the note they told us to write to you in case something scary was happening! We’ll be there to get you as soon as we can. Be sure to obey your teachers; they will take good care of you while you are waiting. Don’t worry, everything will be fine! I love you!

Love, Mommy

Then I would decorate with a bunch of cheery little drawings: our cat doing something silly; a picture of Daddy with a family joke written over it; hearts and stars all over the place.

I would rig a little plastic shelter over my paper/hands as I wrote, to keep the paper from being stained with DRIPPING TEARS.

I am SURE the parliamentary system has its OWN flaws, but right now it is looking much better to me than the United States’s 2-party system.

The problem with a 2-party system is that there isn’t much room to SWITCH. There is a stretch of time in each election when there IS still room for me to choose one candidate or the other—but at a certain point in most elections, when it has become apparent to me that one party fervently opposes things I fervently believe in, it doesn’t matter WHAT cheesehead move the other party pulls, I can’t SWITCH. That’s not how it works.

I mean, I’m trying to imagine, just with the imaginative power of imagination, how I would feel if at this point the candidate I’ve decided to vote for said some truly unacceptable things, some things that meant really no one should vote for him. Would I then vote for the OTHER party? No, because I have already heard THAT candidate say some truly unacceptable things, some things that mean to me that really no one should vote for him.

So in this completely imaginary scenario, I’d be completely stuck: I can’t vote for my guy anymore; I can’t vote for the other guy. My only remaining option is a Protest Vote: either not voting at all, or voting for a third party candidate I know won’t win, just to show how unhappy I am with the choices.

In a parliamentary system, I would have more options, right? I could say, “Wellll, I WAS going to vote for Cheesehead McGee, but it turns out he’s a cheesehead. I’m still appalled by Pinehole McCloud, so certainly I’m not voting for HIM, either, but there’s this other candidate who is sort of an in between candidate. I’ll vote for HER instead.” And if, say, 40% of the voters still liked Cheesehead McGee’s ideas and 40% still liked Pinehole McCloud’s ideas, there could still be 20% power given to MY candidate’s ideas TOO. …Or however that works. I may not be 100% clear on the parliamentary system. Or ours. BUT I KNOW I AM DISCONTENTED.

It is an ongoing frustration to me that the song “Fifty Ways to Leave Your Lover” has, at most, five ways—and that’s only if we count “Make a new plan, Stan” and “You don’t need to be coy, Roy,” which I do NOT.

I think Paul Simon got trapped by his idea of rhyming it to the guys’ names, which is unnecessary and leaves no room for ideas such as “Sit her down and explain you want different things” and “You could try the ‘It’s not you, it’s me’ concept” or “Leave her a note and pack up while she’s at work.” But even if he was going to insist on his Clever Plan, he still could have thought a LITTLE bit about the ideas. How about “Tell her you’re through, Lou” or “Say there’s someone new, Hugh”?

********

William found a rock tumbler at our local “One Man’s Trash” hut (a place where people can put stuff that’s still good but they don’t want/need it anymore, and other people can take it for free). He’s been running it for three days now and make it stopppppppppppppppppppp. There is no place in the house where it can run without disturbing SOMEONE.

But it is worth it to me, because look what he’s making:

He’s putting glass jars and bottles in a paper bag and carefully breaking them, then putting the pieces through the rock tumbler until they’re not sharp, then finding ones that are roughly the same shapes as the states. Every time he gets a new batch of glass pieces, he looks for pieces that are a better match than the ones he’s found so far; right now he’s trying a batch of larger chunks for all those big states, but we’re wondering if they’ll get broken in the tumbler.

I love this project. I have to be careful not to over-enthuse and scare him off it. But if/when he finishes it, I’m going to figure out a way to mount the pieces and frame it or something.

********

Do you want to help us figure something out? My parents are on a road trip, and they’re trying to find one of the houses my mom lived in as a child. They had me go to their house and get a photo album and find a picture of the house:

Do you want to take a guess at the house numbers? There’s one above the two mailboxes, and another above the door. The photo is blurrrrrrrrry. You can click it if you think embiggening it will help, but I haven’t found either larger or smaller has been much use. Paul: “Are you sure those ARE numbers?” Me: “No.”

Follow-up on house numbers! My mom was clearing out some things and found the address written on an old postcard. The house number (above the door) is 1760, and the secret to reading it is that it’s a white number on a black plaque—not black numbers on a white doorframe. Still no word on what the second number is or why it’s there.

Now that I am through it, I notice something I didn’t notice before about the way people discuss the various stages of the baby and toddler years. There are two basic ways of doing it: one is with an obvious understanding that the particular stage will end, and the other is without that understanding.

Both groups understand intellectually that what they’re going through is temporary. It would be pretty much the most condescending thing in the world to say gently, “You do realize this is TEMPORARY, right?” EVERYONE REALIZES IT’S TEMPORARY.

Except they don’t. They haven’t internalized that information, so instead of talking with undertones of this: “This stage is driving me nuts! I can’t wait for this stage to be over! This is not my favorite stage so far! Here is how I am trying to survive this stage!,” they are talking with undertones of this: “Here is how I am trying to survive the unending suffering of my new life. Here are some of my new permanent coping skills. Here are my thoughts about this particular unsolvable issue that will never go away on its own.” They don’t say any of this directly, but it seeps through everything they do say.

And this is what I’ve noticed creeping into the way I think and feel about rearing teenagers. I DO know it’s temporary! I DO! …Except I don’t. I am working on internalizing it, but it will blow your mind to hear that it’s not easy to do that. If it WERE easy to do that, we’d all fully understand ALL the things we can’t seem to make ourselves understand about eating, exercise, success, work, what’s truly important, the passage of time, and our eventual deaths.

I can see the evidence that it’s a stage and that it will be okay: OTHER parents have gone through the teenage years and have come out on the other side of it still recommending that people go ahead and procreate. OTHER parents have gone through the teenage years but then still speak to and enjoy their adult children. OTHER parents have gone through the teenage years, and they LAUGH ABOUT IT.

Doesn’t this sound familiar? This is how I remember reasoning my way through the pregnancy/newborn stage: Other parents have survived it. Other parents went through it and still recommended the idea to others. Other parents even remember certain parts fondly. Most importantly, other parents voluntarily HAVE MORE CHILDREN after the first one! So they must, overall, feel it was a satisfactory and worthwhile experience, and it will likely be okay for me, too.

I thought the same about having a second child: it SEEMS like such a thing would be impossible to do—and yet other parents are doing it. Therefore it IS possible, and will likely be possible for me, too. I DID still panic: if we can barely handle it with BOTH of us and ONE child, how can it possibly work to have two? or three? or more? But during that stage, I remember thinking that we could just take it one baby at a time: yes, we thought we wanted a lot of kids, but we weren’t CONTRACTUALLY COMMITTED to that, we could stop ANY TIME and just have one baby, or just two.

With teenagers, though, here’s what it’s like: imagine being in one of the hard stages of babyhood/toddlerhood, but knowing that you HAD to have four more children. There was NO CHOICE. You have THIS impossible baby/toddler, and there are FOUR MORE BABIES/TODDLERS COMING, LIKE IT OR NOT.

That is what I am having a little trouble dealing with sensibly these days. It doesn’t matter how I do with parenting a teenager, or whether I decide it’s “for me” or not: there are four more of them coming along unavoidably right after this one. And I am currently lacking the internalized understanding that this is a stage that will end.