Hi!
I am due with our second boy in mid-June and we CANNOT come up with a name!
Our first is Theodore Louis (we call him Theo). I ADORE that name…so much so that anything we come up with feels like “Oh it’s great, but it’s not as good as Theodore Louis.”
For the second I’d like a similar “classic but not outdated” vibe. Middle name of Edward (my grandfather) would be nice but not 100% necessary.
Names we like but have vetoed because we have family members with the name:
Jonathan
Andrew
Christopher
Adam
Matthew
David
JoshuaNames I thought I liked but vetoed because I didn’t like the nickname potential for reasons I can’t exactly articulate:
Thomas (Tommy)
Timothy (Tim/Timmy)Names we generally like but don’t necessarily like with Edward (open to middle name suggestions here):
Oliver
Samuel
Gabriel
Elliott
BradyName we ADORED but vetoed because it means “supplanter” and I can’t do that to a second son (or, really, to my first son!):
Jacob (middle name would have been Elliott)
I think this is sufficient (probably too much) info! HELP!
The name Jacob has been in the U.S. Top 10 for the past 25 years, and in the U.S. Top 100 for the past 45 years. In the U.S in 2016 alone, there were 14,416 new baby boys named Jacob. My assumption is that not all of those Jacobs have been firstborns. My further assumption is that although a small number of people may be interested in name meanings and therefore think of “supplanter” when they hear the name, none of them think that meaning is the reason the name was given to the child, any more than they’d think that any of the 6,807 new U.S. baby boys in 2016 were named Cameron because their noses were crooked. I am a name hobbyist, my children have more than one friend named Jacob, and I have never once thought, “Eeek, supplanter, really??” Not even for the ones with older siblings.
You guys are struggling with names; you ADORE the name Jacob—but you can’t use it because it “means” supplanter? Name meanings can be fun, the way star signs and flower meanings can be fun, but this sort of situation is why I am not generally a fan of them: when the fun thing starts preventing people from making the choices they want to make, it stops being fun. The name Jacob is ancient, historical, traditional, a solid name for a person’s whole life—but someone decided it “meant” supplanter so now it’s off the table?
It isn’t even as if the meaning were an absolute thing. According to The Oxford Dictionary of First Names:
The derivation of the name has been much discussed. It is traditionally explained as being derived from Hebrew akev “heel” and to have meant “heel grabber,” because when Jacob was born “his hand took hold of Esau’s heel” (Genesis 25:26). This is interpreted later in the Bible as “supplanter”: Esau himself remarks, “Is he not rightly named Jacob? for he has supplanted me these two times” (Genesis 27:36).
You are going to give up the name you adore just because a few thousand years ago some peeved biblical character used wordplay to diss his brother? “Jacob” hardly even sounds like “akev”; and even if it was in fact the exact same word and we were discussing the use of the name Akev, “heel” is not a synonym for “supplanter.” The whole thing is ridiculous: Esau made some pissed-off joke and now, thousands of years later, parents think they have to cross a name off their list because of it? I won’t have it! Imagine thousands of years in our future, someone finding a book from our times in which someone made a joke about someone named Adam and the similar-sounding words “a damn,” and baby-name-book authors deciding the name Adam therefore “meant” damnation, and then parents deciding not to use the name because of it. No! We will not lose perfectly good names to this!
But if you can’t let it go, then my favorites from your list are Oliver, Gabriel, and Elliot: I think they all work very well with the sibling name Theodore. Samuel is good, too. Brady seems too modern/surnamey to me with Theodore.
I am not very concerned with the flow of first/middle names, especially when the middle name is an honor name: I think in time, the satisfaction of the honor name comes to outweigh any small sacrifice in ideal flow. I think all the names on the not-great-with-Edward list are fine or even good with Edward. If a combination doesn’t sit right with you, though, or if it prevents you from wanting to use the name, I suggest finding another honor name—perhaps from the list of names you can’t use because of having family members with the names. Or perhaps Timothy or Thomas would be good as a middle name, since that placement avoids the nicknames. I especially like the way the sound of Thomas lines up with the sound of Louis: Theodore Louis and Oliver Thomas, for example, or Theodore Louis and Elliot Thomas.
I recommend scrapping the practice of comparing each name choice with the name of your first child. Not only does it make sense that your first child’s name would have been your favorite name, and so logically you wouldn’t like any other names as much as that one; but also at this point that name is no longer a NAME, it’s a CHILD. No name can compare with that, not until it too represents a child you love so much. Don’t try to find a name you like as much as the name Theodore Louis; just try to pick your favorite name from all the names that remain.