Baby Boy or Girl Sherman, Sibling to Amelia and Norah

Marcy writes:

My husband and I are elated to be expecting our third child, gender unknown, due in June.  This little one is a surprise, but one we welcome and anticipate with great joy!  My husband is still exhausted of the naming talk of a year ago (when we named our youngest), but I am already turning all the options over in my mind.  I need a sounding board, and some great ideas.  When my friend Amy and I were both pregnant with our second daughters last year, you helped her choose the name Eliza, and I have full confidence that Swistle is just the place for us to find our third child’s name.
We have a lot of time, but with 13 nieces and nephews and lots of friends with good name taste, many of my favorites are already taken (or a too-similar variant has been used).  We spend a LOT of time with our extended family.  So, while I’m sure others wouldn’t worry a bit about similar cousin names, it would definitely cause concern for us.  Most of the cousins attend the same church and are engaged in regular playtime/activities together.  And of course Gram Gram would never figure out who’s who with names too similiar!
We would love your input for both boy and girl names!  We’re wide open when it comes to boys’ names, though something more classic/traditional likely suits us best.  For a girl, her middle name will be Louise, after my mother.  I could consider it for a first name as well, but right now I’m leaning towards Louise for the middle.  I don’t like the idea of modifying Louise to Louisa or Elouise.  I want to keep it as is.
My name is Marcy and my husband is Daniel. Our daughters are named Amelia Mae and Norah Lane.     Our last name sounds like Sherman. 
Amelia’s name rang in at #55 on the SSN list for her year (was #68 on the list when we chose it, and we had no idea it would see such a jump.  It was up to #30 by 2011!), and Norah at #263 with the H (#137 without it, so a bit higher than that combined).  Like most folks, I think we’d prefer something outside the top 100, but really we’re open to even a very common name, if it really is the perfect one for our baby.

A few of our “dont’s”:
  • Rhyming with our names, with sibling names, or with the middle name or last name;  
  • Name or nn too similar to Amelia’s (Millie/Mil – and her sister calls her Mimi)
  • Name or nn too similar to Norah’s (Nor, Norrie, Noley – her sister’s name for her before she could say it properly)
  • Aything that would be nicknamed Ellie or Emmy or Addie (sooo common around here!);
  • Anything that causes a lispy-ness in the transition from the end of the first or middle name to the last name this includes most names ending in s).  That SH sound can be rough!

I’ll begin with girls, since we have it a little more together in that arena!  Currently under consideration for a girl are Vivian/Vivien/Vivienne (spelling preference, anyone?), to be called Viv/Vivy/Vivie and Josie.  Both seem to work with Louise so it’s not a bad place to start.  I do like Josephine for the full name, to be called Josie, but my husband does not like it, preferring Josie as-is. I think I could get into Violet too, but I feel like it only flows with Louise if it’s prnounced “Vie-let” instead of “Vi-o-let”.  How would most folks pronounce it?

In light of our close family and heap of cousins, these favorites of mine are OFF the table:
  • Clara (niece named Claire)
  • Anna (niece named Hannah)
  • Ada (niece named Ava)
  • Julia (niece named Julia Elizabeth)
  • Eliza (friend’s daughter.)
  • Celia (same friend’s older daughter)
  • Micah (we almost named our first Micah Marie, but changed late in the game to Amelia Mae afte rmy husband and I started swooning over Mae.  We now have very dear friends with a baby boy name Micah, so it’s permanently nixed.
  • Abigail (niece name) – Although I wouldn’t choose this with Louise anyway becasue of the L at the end
  • Chloe (friend’s daughter)
We’re struggling a little (okay, a LOT) more with a boy’s name.  With our previous pregnancies, names considered for a boy were Cael Arthur (after my grandpa, Arthur), Grayson Paul (decided we really just like Gray, not Grayson or Grady as much), Charles (after my other grandpa) and Wilcox (my mother in law’s maiden name). 
Cael is out now due to nephews named both Kade and Caleb.  I liked the name, but it was really my husband’s pick. And Wilcox is already used as well.
Gray is still in the mix, as well as Charles and Paul (Daniel’s middle name).  Although I actually prefer to use Daniel over Paul if we use my husband’s name.  I love the name Daniel!  :)  Of course I’m not sure what’s best to pair it with.  If we use it, I’d like it as a middle name instead of a first, to avoid confusion.  We also like Henry.  I Iike Mac/Mack (a nod to my maiden name, which is an Irish Mc name), but it’s so much more casual than most of the other names we like.  It’s probably not for us. I have just as I sit and type decided I like Benjamin, too. But we just aren’t LOVING anything yet, and the list of names we like doesn’t seem to be producing any amazing combinations.
I’ve listed a mix of my nephews’ first and middle names below.  These are names we’d like to avoid. I think we can avoid the names on the Friends list too, though it’s less of a priority:
FAMILY: Kade, Reed, August, Wilcox, Shepard, Wiliam, Adam, Joel, Wade, Kenneth, Caleb
FRIENDS: Micah, Jack, Christopher, Edison/Eddie, Isaac
My husband has vetoed James (he’s not sure why, since we both like the name, but he just knows that’s not it!) and Benjamin (I just asked him – same as with James – it’s just not THE name, even though it’s a name he likes). Finneus/Finneas/Phineas. I suggested Finneus Gray – which he says sounds like a storybook character and not a real person. :)  We also would not likely choose anything like Cooper, Carter, Parker, Hudson, etc.
I actually love August (a family name and one of the nephews’ names).  It’s obviously taken, but something with that vibe might be nice.  And I love Wiliam, as well as its nickname, Will.  It’s nice to find a name that can sound both formal and a little serious (August/William) and also ornery (Gus/Will).
I sincerely hope you can help us wade through this mire of names before our heads explode trying to work it through on our own!
Thanks so much for your consideration!
and
I realize we’re still a long way from our due date, and I’m really trying not to get all Shawshank Redemption on you by sending a new email every day/week/month, but as a quick update, I wanted you do know that my husband has now vetoed ALL of the girl names on our current list, save Josie.  Which I do like, but am not convinced enough to commit to.  EXHAUSTING.  You can see why we need to get an early start on this! :)  Anyway, I will do my best to restrain myself from begging/pleading/groveling for assistance (at least until we find out the gender :)).  I am having so much fun reading your site for inspiration in the meantime!

Name update! Marcy writes:

I really enjoyed all the feedback and ideas from you readers and from your many other posts! Thanks for posting my question! Your method of listing out all of the name options as well as listing the names within the sibling set was easy to put into practice on my own and extremely helpful to us.

We found out a week ago that we are having a girl, our third!  We are thrilled!

Despite working around a long list of “taken” names we liked, as well as sorting through our sometimes different naming preferences, my husband and I managed to produce a list of five names that pleased us both.   We finally landed on June Louise, which we both LOVE!

June entered the game late, since I had to decide if a June born in June was perfect, too cheesy, or maybe just didn’t matter.   Once I settled on it being perfect (my husband’s great Aunt June was a June born in June, also!), June quickly rose to the top of our mutual list, and won out over the others [the full list of names we could agree on included: Caroline Louise, Miriam Louise (my 2nd pl vote), Mariah Louise and Halle Louise (his 2nd pl vote)].

My pets that didn’t pass the husband test included: Louise Adele (I love, love, love this, but I don’t feel sad about not using it, since I’m now certain this baby is June!), Vivian Louise (the name I wanted for our next girl before we were even expecting, but that husband never loved) and Magnolia Faye (I think this felt too southern and unusual to the mister, but I discovered it on your site and couldn’t help but swoon!  I also didn’t want to give up Louise, but I liked Magnolia much better with Faye, and I my husband actually does like Faye).

Thanks so much!

Baby Naming Issue: An 8th-Generation Hephzibah

K. writes:

We are expecting our first baby, a little girl, in early December and have yet to settle on a name. In my family, there is a strong tradition of passing along family names; I am a seventh generation Hephzibah, although I go by my middle name. I feel somewhat compelled to pass along Hephzibah, but the baby will be taking my husband’s last name, Budzick, which makes for a lot of B and Z sounds. If we don’t use Hephzibah, I would like to have some family name connection to my side. Other family names on my side that I’ve considered for middle names are Catharine and Caroline.
First names that are on our list right now are Eloise, Esther, and Nora.
Which combinations with the family names would you suggest with our first names, or can you suggest any other first names that might work? I hope you can help. Is there any way to gracefully incorporate Hephzibah?
Thank you!

 

This letter has languished in my inbox while I wring my hands over it. On one hand, I can’t advise ditching an 8th-generation name; on the other hand, the zi-bah-bud-zi of Hephzibah Budzick is a significant hurdle. What are the odds that of all the surnames in this world, it would be one that specifically challenged the use of the specific family name?

Well. It would not be the worst trial a child has ever faced. I see less-than-ideal name combinations all the time in credits and class lists. And if she went by a middle name as you do, she could have the family name and yet avoid most of the name awkwardness. In fact, we could maybe even spin the combination as awesome: two Z’s! two B’s! A very memorable and distinctive name!

Or Hephzibah could be the middle name.

Or is there room to consider not using your husband’s surname?

I think it comes down to how you feel about it. I can’t tell from the letter if you want to use the name, or if it’s only a feeling of obligation to keep up the tradition. Have you been glad to have the name yourself? Do you think you would have felt unhappy if your parents had been the one to drop the tradition?

As Rita pointed out in a comment on another post about naming traditions, all naming traditions eventually get dropped, so it’s just a matter of which set of parents drops it. It seems to me that the set of parents to drop it should be the first set that doesn’t want to use the name. My in-laws dropped a “since our ancestors came from the old country” naming tradition when they named Paul, and Paul and I were both so very grateful; if they hadn’t dropped it, we would have.

It’s completely different, though, if you love the naming tradition and WANT to keep it. And it’s an ancient name with a wonderful meaning (according to The Oxford Dictionary of First Names: “my delight is in her”—i.e., in the daughter), and it’s an important name in your family. Those things seem to me to dwarf the surname issue if you’d like to continue to pass down the name.

If you decide not to use it as the first name, I do think I’d advise using it as the middle. Any of your first name options work with it. I think my favorite is Eloise, since it plays up the repeating Z sound in the three names.

If you decide not to use Hephzibah at all, my favorite combinations are Eloise Caroline, Esther Catherine, and Nora Catherine—but I liked both middle names with Eloise and Esther. (I was more opinionated about Nora because I didn’t like the “ora” of Nora with the “aro” of Caroline.)

A few similar first names: Eliza, Louisa, Eleanor.

 

Name update! K. writes:

I wrote to you for advice a couple of months ago about what to name our baby girl. Well, she arrived (finally) on December 18, healthy and beautiful. I really appreciated your thoughtful response to my particular situation and all of the commenters’ opinions as well. I was surprised at the overall positive response to my family name, Hephzibah, and it affirmed my feeling that I really did want to pass it on to my daughter. In the end, we chose it for her middle name, which seemed like the perfect solution. So, watch out world, because Eloise Hephzibah Budzick has arrived!

Thanks so much for your help!

Screen shot 2014-06-18 at 9.15.31 AM

Baby Boy or Girl Roomy-with-a-T, Sibling to Finnian

Megan writes:

My husband and I have a 16 month old named Finnian.  We absolutely love his name and want to find one we love as much for his sibling due in February.   The gender is going to be a surprise, so we don’t know if Finn will have a brother or sister.

Here’s the thing,  I have a list of girl names picked out that my husband and I both really like.  I would be completely happy naming the baby any of them, so I’m not to worried on that account.  We are having no luck with boy names, however.

There aren’t any family names that we would particularly like to use. We are Roman Catholic and prefer that the name have a saint associated with it, although my husband doesn’t really like the style of Old Testament names. I would love a name that sounds good with Finnian, but not too “matchy” (like Kieran, Cian, Brendan, or Killian).

Here are the names we’ve considered so far:

Peter Campion- I like Peter a lot, but don’t love the nn Pete,  love the mn Campion, after Edmund Campion

Benedict- This one has gotten turned down because of the generally negative connotations of Eggs Benedict, Benedict Arnold, and the teasing potential in the ending (DH hates Benjamin so that’s a no go

Leo- I really like this name, but is becoming much too popular for my taste.  I’m afraid of picking too trendy a name, because I was one of a what seems like a million Megans born in the late 80s

Blaise- I love this name, unusual but not unheard of.  DH really can’t get on board with it, however

Beckett- I like this name a lot, but DH says only as a middle name.

Our last name sounds like “Roomy,” but with a “T.”
Can you and your readers give us some other boy name suggestions?

p.s. Here are the girl names we like to give you a better idea of our style : Genevieve (nn Evie), Bridget, Gwendolyn, and Mariel

Thanks so much,

 

I’m not Roman Catholic, but I have the Saints section of The Baby Name Wizard. Without knowing any of the stories behind the names, I’d pick out:

Aidric
Bertrand
Brogan
Colman
Cormac
Darius
Declan
Edmund
Elias
Felix
Ivan
Marek
Ronan
Sebastian
Silas
Xavier

If you like Blaise, I wonder if you’d like Blaine.

If you like Beckett and Benedict, I wonder if you’d like Bennett—perhaps with a saint’s name as the middle name.

Would you want to consider Campion as the first name? Or using Edmund instead of (or in addition to) Campion?

Leo is somewhat more popular than Finn/Finnian (the Social Security Administration has Leo at #167 in 2011, near George, Alan, Maddox, Jonah, and Kenneth), but nowhere near the popularity of the name Megan—a Top 10 name in the 1980s. In 1985, there were over 20,000 new baby girls named Megan and another 4665 named Meghan; in 2011, there were 2226 new baby boys named Leo and 2631 named Leonardo. Even combining Leo and Leonardo and yet not counting Meagans and Meaghans and Megs (so, building up the Leos unfairly high, while reducing the Megans unfairly low), there were more than five times as many Megans per classroom in the 1980s than there are Leos per classroom now. My main hesitation about Leo would be not its popularity but rather that I think it’s a little awkward with the surname.

 

 

Name update! Megan writes:

I wanted to thank you and your readers for all of your advice and input on boys’ names. They gave us some great ideas for the future..  This time, however, we had a baby girl!  Genevieve Noelle was born on Valentine’s day.  Big brother Finnian loves his little sister Gigi!

Thanks again,

Baby Naming Issue: South Indian Surname Traditions

Holly writes:

I love your blog and how fairly you weigh everyone’s options. I have been thinking of writing in with our surname problem for a while and am curious to see if you have any suggestions.

So, let me give you the basics first. I’m Holly Sch1ltz (rhymes with stilts) and my husband is V1gnesh “Vic” Vij@y@kumar (pronounced Vih-jai-yah-koo-mar–emphasis on the jai and mar syllables). We’ve been married for 2.5 year and I still have my maiden name.

I like my name and will probably just keep it, but I also have no problem changing my name for the sake of our family having a common name (husband included–we could be the so-and-so’s or the so-and-so family). I haven’t changed it yet because we don’t have a clear choice for a family name. Vic doesn’t care at all about what name I keep as a surname and has joked w/ his dad about giving all future kids my name. We’ve talked about it with them and though I’m sure they’d prefer us to keep with tradition, they aren’t very forthcoming with opinions. So, the decision is ultimately ours without fear of repercussions.

The problem lies in his family’s South Indian naming tradition. There is no family surname. Once a man (Firstname Lastname) marries, his wife and kids all take Firstname as their surname (Wife Firstname, Kid #1 Firstname, etc.) and the man will always have a different last name. Boys then keep their dad’s first name (pass on their own first to their kids) and it’s assumed that girls will take on their husband’s first name. So, Vij@y@kum@r is my father-in-law’s first name. So, I’d become Holly V1gnesh if we followed tradition (as would our kids) and Vic’s name would stay the same. We’ve been told that you can trace family lineage way back to a certain priest’s family that had a surname that is very long but this hasn’t been used for generations and wouldn’t really tie us to his family at all.

The actual question is what last name do we give our future kids?

  • Option 1: We follow tradition and give them my husband’s Indian first name, V1gnesh, and I take that name on as well. In this scenario, my husband would have a different last name than the rest of the family.
  • Option 2: We give them V1gnesh as a surname and Vic and I retain our respective “maiden” names. If I change my name, I’d prefer that my whole family ends up with the same last name, as a group. We will probably always live where this naming tradition is not practiced and would forever have to explain it, so wouldn’t it just be easier to have different last names than to go through the whole schpeal any time someone asks?
  • Option 3: We ditch that naming tradition and take up a family surname, Vic’s last name. His cousins plan to do this (different last name) and his sister already has. But, Vic doesn’t really want to pass on Vij@y@kum@r since hardly anyone can pronounce it and there’s a lot of rhyming potential for kids in those first three syllables.
  • Option 4: We hyphenate. Hyphenating seems like a nightmare, this is not an actual option.
  • Option 5: Friends have suggested we all make up a new name using an anagram of both of our last names, but that seems like trouble with all of the strange consonants: s_c_h_i_l_t_z_v_i_j_a_y_a_k_u_m_a_r
  • Option 6: We shorten Vic’s last name to Kumar. He’s brought it up a couple of times in the 100’s of times we’ve had this same conversation. It’s a more common name than his last name.
  • Option 7: We give them my last name. I do feel a little weird about this. My family has a patriarchal naming system, my in-laws may be moving back to India in the next few years, and Vic doesn’t care to teach our kids to speak Tamil or Hindi, so I don’t want to cut out such a strong family tie if I’m not adamant about my name being passed on in the first place.

We plan to name our kids American names rather than Indian names–resulting in names that will be radically different than the list of surnames of men in the family before them. They can carry on the South Indian naming tradition if they want, but we figured the pattern would be broken our generation or the next. How bad would it be to make up a new name? Are there any identity issues involved with kids having different last names than both parents? Our kids will be ours and neither of us has strong feelings about them representing our family through surnames, but I’m concerned about how they’ll feel growing up. Do you have any other options you’d recommend?

Thanks for any advice you could send our way!

My favorite option is to use the names from your husband’s side of the family, combined with the surname traditions from your side of the family and the culture in which you live. That is, all of you become the Vij@y@kumars—or the Kumars, as your husband prefers. This seems like the best compromise for a complicated issue: it keeps a part from each side of the family while also giving you a unified family surname.

Another possibility is to give all the children V1gnesh (the name that would be their surname in South India) as a middle name or second middle name. Then they would have their complete South Indian names, but with another surname you would all take (Kumar, perhaps) tacked onto the end for ease of usage in your culture and for unity of family surname. Perhaps your original surname could be the first middle name, for ultimate inclusiveness.

If you were going to combine the names, I don’t think I’d try to use all the letters. I’d use Schi1tz-Kumar to hyphenate, or something like Schilmar to combine.

As for the other questions (is it a problem to make up a new surname, are there identity issues involved in having an assortment of surnames in a family), those fall outside my area of experience. I suspect you will get anecdotes from across the entire spectrum, from “Everyone in our family had a different surname and I never even noticed, and no one else ever had a moment’s confusion about it” to “I had a different surname from my mom and step-dad and it always made me feel excluded.”

So many other issues contribute to such feelings: the cultural norms of the area the family lives in, whether there are other reasons a child might feel the surnames are symbolic of family cohesiveness, the personality of the particular child, etc. It seems like in this case the explanation of the issues involved in choosing a surname (and the exposure to the various surname systems of both sides of the family, as well as living in a culture where many families have assorted surnames) would be enough to make any solution untraumatic to a child.

Discussion Topic: Do Your Friends Have the Same Naming Style as You?

I have a question, and I’m not quite sure what it is. So maybe what I have is a discussion topic. The discussion topic is about whether your friends tend to have the same naming style as you or not—and how far off do they get.

And, backwards from there: if you met someone with a wildly different naming style than yours, would it feel like it Meant Something? That is, would you think to yourself, “Oh…her kids are named ____, ____, and ____?” and get a little sinking feeling because it seemed to indicate that the friendship might not work out?

My friend Mairzy and I have what I consider easily-friendship-compatible naming styles. The styles are different, yet we can both appreciate the other one’s style—and we have areas of overlap. We are an “I like it for someone else’s baby” friendship. We can discuss names recreationally, and we both tremendously enjoyed discussing name possibilities for the children who were born after we started being friends.

I have another friend who is more like Top 10 names for boys and girls, while I’m more like Top 50 for boys and Top 1000 for girls. If she were more interested in baby names, we’d be able to discuss them recreationally: I don’t flinch from her choices and she doesn’t flinch (much) from mine. Her choices have in fact given me a greater appreciation for Top 10 names.

I have another friend who has two children with names of my style, and one with a name that’s quite different and of a style I dislike. I felt a little dip at the announcement of that third child’s name—a feeling of “Maybe we don’t know each other as well as I thought.”

I was stressed when my friends who are also my brother and sister-in-law were expecting their first child. The subject felt fraught with meaning. I was intensely relieved when they picked something great. It wasn’t the same style as mine, but it was in one of my Style I Admire categories rather than in one of my Style I Dislike categories.

If I meet someone at kindergarten drop-off/pick-up, and I ask the names of her children and she says names of a style I would never, ever consider because I dislike it so much, I admit I do think, “Huh. Maybe this isn’t going to work out.” But I’m always aware that my initial reaction might be completely unfounded, and I don’t seriously ditch a potential friendship based on it; it’s just one piece of information in the information-gathering stage of getting to know someone.

But it does catch my attention, just as many other not-necessarily-(but-maybe)-relevant-to-friendship details do: “Oh…they live in that absolutely enormous and beautifully-decorated house?” “Oh, she loved [movie I hated]?” “Oh, she dedicates two hours daily to housework?” “Oh, she doesn’t know where the library is?” To me it’s one of many indicators of compatibility: just as I’d make certain preliminary (not conclusive, but preliminary) assumptions about a family with a giant house and more luxury cars than adults, I’d make certain preliminary assumptions about a family with children named Apple, Pax, and Pilot.

How is it for you? Are you dying to know the names of a new acquaintance’s children because it seems like Interesting and Important Information? Do the names add to the information you have about the person?

And how do the naming styles of your established friends compare with your own style?

Baby Girl Eason, Sister to Noah

Meg writes:

Hello!

Right, here goes! I am not American, nor do I live in America, Buut I do read your site religiously both baby names and regular blog, and have done since before I had my son, whom your site helped name nearly 2 years ago.
Sooo this feels like the obvious place to come when faced with the challenge of naming baby number 2! So I would be so grateful if you would consider helping me :)
The baby’s surname Will be  Eason and she is a girl :) her big brother’s name is Noah and he has two middle names which id love and would like her to have two middle names too.
She is due end of Jan, but due to complications I had with my son could come earlier (eeep)
Im having a hugely hard time to name her… it seems its a million times harder to name a second baby…. without falling in to a “naming trap!”….. Me and my partner have very different tastes so thats the main issue…
Names I love
Edith (Edie)
Harper (not very popular here … yet!)
Betsy (he hates this name but its my fave!)
Ottilie
As you can see I seem to go more toward what are known as “old lady names”.
Names he loves
Ada
We both don’t mind
Olive
Talulah
Neither of us are crazy for the two names we agree on … they don’t feel like her name ….

 Middle name Would most likely be Kate or kitty for family or Bobby also for family but obviously will depend on first name.
So we are getting No where fast! I know we have a little while but with an older sibling I really want to have a for him to call her so when she is born she isn’t stuck with “Baby sister “as her name for months and months (this has happened to some of our friends) Im trying to stay away from the top 10 names (Noah wasn’t top 10 here when I picked it :P) But it isn’t the end of the world if its the right name and its slightly more popular than i’d hoped … Im really hoping that having another countries spin on this will help to, shine some light on some names we would have never thought of …. ? maybe! ha
Anyway thank you!!

 

The first names that come to mine are Hazel and Lila. Then Harriet.

When I saw Edith on your list, I first thought of Ruth, and then of Esther, then of Estelle, then of Dorothy/Dorothea and Martha and Lilith. Then I saw Talulah and thought of Tabitha, which made me think of Thora and Matilda.

Ada makes me think of Ava, and also of Ida and Ivy and Daisy and Jada and Dahlia and Deirdre. With Edith, it makes me think of Agatha.

Olive makes me think of Hazel and Lila as mentioned before, but also of Livia and Silvia and Willa.

Talulah makes me think of Lila and Tabitha as mentioned before, and also of Lucille and Lucy and Louisa and Eloise.

If he wouldn’t mind YOU calling her Betsy as long as he didn’t have to, it would be sweet to name her Elizabeth or Elsbeth or something similar (I see The Baby Name Wizard mentions Bettina) and have Betsy as a special nickname only you call her. Or you could use Elizabeth as one of her middle names, and then you can call her Betsy from that. Or of course you can just call her Betsy with nothing connecting it to her name—I can picture cooing “Aren’t you my sweet little betsy-boo?” to a baby as an endearment rather than as a name.

Name update! Meg writes:

Hi !
I can’t believe the pregnancy has flown by so fast and now here I am with my one month old baby daughter!
We went back and forth over names, I added many of beautiful names suggested by your brilliant readers to my list, and we got to her being just over a week old before we finally settled on a name listening to how important it seems to have choice with a name we went for one with nicknames for choice.

Darwin Bobby Violet
We call her Winnie and dee dee, the bobby part became more important when she arrived on my brother Roberts birthday!
Violet as v names are a family tradition on my partners side.

Thank you so much for all your help :)
(I have attached a photo :))
Screen shot 2014-06-18 at 9.22.05 AM

Baby Girl M!n, Sister to Theodore: Hard to Give Up the Name Eliza

Jane writes:

I really need your help! Our baby girl is due soon (Nov. 12) and we’re having an impossible time agreeing on a name. Her middle name will likely be Jane and we’re using my husband’s last name, which is M!n (rhymes with tin). I love the name Eliza, but my husband really doesn’t – to such a degree that it sadly won’t be her name. His favorite names are Lucy and Penelope, which are nice, but I’m having a hard time moving beyond Eliza. Because of the last name, we can’t use first names that begin with “C” or “Se,” and I would prefer to avoid names beginning with “B.” Also, we have a son named Theodore (Teddy).

Tremendous thanks in advance for your help! I am extremely eager to hear your suggestions and ideas from your readers.

I love the name Eliza, too, and Eliza Jane is so wonderful. Would it work to use Eliza or Eliza Jane or Jane Eliza as the middle name(s)? Then you’d still have your special name in there. This solution works especially well if your husband will be getting his choice of first name: the deal becomes “You have the name you love as the first name; then in victory you graciously allow me to use the name I love as the middle name.” Lucy Jane Eliza M!n, Lucy Eliza M!n, Penelope Jane Eliza M!n, Penelope Eliza Jane M!n, etc.

The name Lila is similar in sound to Eliza. Lila Jane M!n.

Eloise, too. Eloise Jane M!n.

I also really love Penelope. That would be my choice over Lucy, especially with a Theodore: Theodore and Penelope are so great together.

Other names that come to mind when I think of Eliza/Penelope/Lucy and Theodore:

Annabel
Felicity
Fiona
Genevieve
Hazel
Josephine

I might add to this list, but want to get this posted quickly since this could already be too late.

Baby Naming Issue: How Many Repeated Endings are Okay Per Sibling Group?

Amy writes:

My husband and I are sort of in a debate and I think you are the one who could help us.  Although we’re not expecting our third child (yet…that I know of!) we have already been going through the lists of names that we had for our previous two children and debating whether they would ever be ‘useable’ for us.  The problem is endings.  We have a son named Samuel, and my husband likes the name Nathaniel/Nathanael; I do as well, but I feel like another ‘el’ ending sounds odd.  Same with girl’s names – our daughter is Clara, but all the names we like for girls (Anna, Louisa, Fiona, etc.) are soft-a ending names.
Is there a limit?  I mean, how much of one ending can a family handle?  Maybe you could do a poll?
Thanks!

Oh, interesting! I think it would be difficult to come up with a number answer (“Two. Two is the limit”) because there are so many factors:

• How many children are in the family

• Whether the matching endings are given sequentially or with other children in between

• Whether the matching endings have been given to all the children born so far, or if other endings have also been used

• How similar/different the names are in other ways

• How unusual/attention-catching the particular ending is

• Whether the children with matched endings are all of the same sex

• Whether the matching endings sound exactly alike

• Whether the matching endings are spelled exactly alike

• Your particular family’s feelings on how appealing it is to have matchy names

• Some other hard-to-pin-down factor that we know when we see/hear it (but which may vary from person/family to person/family)

If you had, say, five children, and two of them had names ending in an -en sound, but those children were first and fourth, and one of the children was a boy and the other was a girl, and the ending was spelled -en in one case and -yn in the other case, and one of the names had two syllables and the other had three and the consonant sounds were completely different—then it seems like it’s no big deal, and you could even use an -in/-an/-en/-yn name on an additional child without a fuss.

If on the other hand you had two girls named Isabel and Annabel, that already seems like too many -bel endings—and I’m not sure it would help to separate them by several other names. Unless of course you LIKED the matching: there are, after all, plenty of families naming sibling sets Madalyn and Madison, or Ella and Emma.

I think what matters most is whether it feels too matchy or attention-grabbing when you’re saying the list of kids (the definition of “too” will vary from person to person). Samuel and Nathaniel sound rhymey/sing-songy to me because of the similarity of the M and N sounds before the -uel/-iel, and also because of the similarity of the -uel and -iel sounds themselves. I MIGHT use both names in a family with a lot of children, if there were several children in between: Samuel, Clara, William, Emma, Nathaniel, for example.

For comparison, a name like Paul, while it ends in L like Nathaniel and Samuel, gives me no such urge to increase separation. Samuel and Paul have completely different sounds: the -l ending sounds different, the letters before the -l ending sound different (“yool/yul” vs. “awl”), the syllables are different, everything is different. It also helps that there’d be another child in between: Samuel, Clara, and Paul just sounds like everyone has a pleasing L-sound to tie the names together.

The repeating -a ending seems almost like a non-issue. Many, many names end with -a, and it’s not very ear-catching or distinctive. With the example of Clara and Anna, they don’t sound rhymey even though they have the same number of syllables and same emphasis: the letter-sounds before the -a ending are completely different, as are the rest of the sounds in the names. If you wanted to increase the difference, you almost couldn’t do better than Clara and Fiona/Louisa: different end-sounds, different syllables, AND different emphasis. If I encountered a family with daughters named Clara, Fiona, Anna, and Louisa, I might notice that they all had -a endings (which I wouldn’t consider negative), or I might just notice that they were a great sibling group.

If a combination does bother you, there are often options: Samuel and Nathan instead of Samuel and Nathaniel; Clara and Anne/Annabel instead of Clara and Anna.

Baby Naming Issue: The Chosen Name has a Bad Meaning

Brooke writes:

I am less than two weeks away from my due date and we are in a predicament. I would really really appreciate hearing your thoughts and your reader’s thoughts on this name situation. We have a name we really like and while my husband thinks it’s rediculous that I took this name off the list a long time ago because of it’s meaning, I am still hesitant and want to know if I would be making a mistake by using it. The name we like is Cora which means “maiden” – this alone is no big deal really. The middle name we planned on using is Marie which means “bitter”. Would Cora Marie hate us when she gets older and finds out her name means bitter maiden??? Marie is my middle name and my mom’s middle name. We want to use a family name from my side since we did a family name from my husband’s side for our son’s middle name.

A little background info that might help: my name is Brooke, husband is Bryan and our son is Drew Thomas. Our last name is Fletcher. Our top girl names are Cora, Kate and Audrey.

Cora Marie
Kate Amelia
Audrey Kate

Family names: Marie (my middle and my mom’s) Lucille (my grandma’s first name), June (my mom’s favortie aunt), Kate (way back on both my grandmother and grandfather’s side), Rosa (I LOVE Cora Rose, but this would be a stretch and Rosa is way far back in the family tree). I also love Cora Mae – could Mae be a newer version of Marie or am I pulling at strings here???

I am dying to know your thoughts and am completely open to any suggestions other than what have going!!!

Name meanings are fun, but this is where they bite us in the butt.

Historically, people have enjoyed attributing meanings to items. That doesn’t mean those meanings are inherent to the items: one community decides a certain flower or certain color or certain gem or certain day of the year means one thing, and another community might decide something completely different. In one culture, white fabric is used for weddings and religious purity; in another, for funerals and mourning. Which of those reflects the true meaning of the color white? Neither: both meanings are imposed upon the color rather than obtained from it. Yellow roses mean “jealousy”—but also “friendship,” “apology,” and “dying love” (source). Which of those is the REAL meaning? None of them: all such meanings have been tacked onto the object for fun. If someone gives you yellow roses, the most likely message is “Here, have some pretty yellow roses.”

It is the same with the name Cora Marie: it doesn’t truly MEAN “bitter maiden” unless you intend it to mean that, any more than a yellow rose truly means “jealousy” if you don’t intend it to mean that. A yellow rose means only itself: it is a yellow rose. The name Cora Marie means only itself: it is the proper noun Cora, followed by the proper noun Marie. Baby name books don’t even agree on the meanings of names; and combining names to make compound meanings creates compound problems: the meaning of one name is not designed to refer to the meaning of another name.

Marie is said to mean bitter because it’s similar to the name Mara which, in a Bible story, a character claims means bitter (source). Or maybe Mara means “to flap” or “to be filthy” or “to rebel” (source). In either case, does the possible meaning of a Hebrew word pronounced MAH-rah really impact the meaning of the French name pronounced mah-REE—and to the extent that a child sharing that name with millions of other women throughout history (as well as with her personal family ancestors) would take it as a personal slap in the face from her parents? Is that how you feel about your middle name, or how your mom feels about hers? Do any of us wonder, when we meet a Marie, if she hates her parents for giving her such an insulting name?

Besides, according to the The Oxford Dictionary of First Names, the names Marie, Maria, and Mary are separate from the name Mara and instead all come from the Latin word meaning “sea” (the same root as words such as marine, marina, and mariner). Presumably your daughter will not mind as much being known as a “sea maiden”—or mermaid, if you prefer.

The “maiden” part is also uncertain: according to the same book, the name Cora was invented in the 1800s by a novelist. Did that author imbue the name with a meaning at the moment of its invention? Was a special court convened to divine the true meaning of the name before registering it in the baby name books? No: the Oxford Dictionary speculates that the name “could represent a Latinized form of Greek Kore ‘maiden’.” Nobody knows what Cora means, because the name Cora doesn’t have a meaning—not that this stops the baby name books from reporting one.

By all means, if you enjoy playing with the meanings of names, go ahead and do it: just as it might be fun to have a bouquet of striped and solid carnations seem to say “yes” and “no” at the same time, it could be fun to say a name like Cora Beatrix meant “happy maiden.” But letting these imposed meanings stop you from using names you love is another matter. It would be like digging up the hydrangeas you loved because you didn’t want your neighbors to think you were frigid.

Baby Girl Welch

S. writes:

I have been following your blog for a long time and love reading your baby naming advice. I am hoping that you and your readers can offer some suggestions on a name for our baby girl.

This past June my little brother (and only sibling) passed away unexpectedly after a horrible accident. He was only 25 years old. Being not far apart in age, we were always really close, and so it goes without saying that losing him has been incredibly difficult.

Two days after he died, and after almost a year of trying, my husband and I found out that we were having a baby.  This is our first, and we are beyond excited. Our little girl is due on March 8th.

When I first found out that I was pregnant, I knew without a doubt that I would honor my brother somehow with our baby’s name. My brother’s name was Jordan, spelled with an “i” between the “J” and the “o.” My parents did this because the Italian version is Giordano and they wanted that to be represented in his name. My maiden name is very Italian, so it worked. I decided that I wanted to use his name as our baby’s middle name, regardless of whether we had a boy or girl.

Now that we know we are having a girl, we are having a hard time finding a name that sounds good with my brothers name.  I know it’s always more challenging to pick a first name to go with a middle name than the other way around, but we are beginning to think that because of our situation, we might just have to live with the fact that our daughter’s first and middle names may not go together as well as we would like.

Our last name is Welch, spelled with an “s” instead of a “c.” We have a good list of boys names that we love, but not so many girls names.  For girls I tend to like to antique charm and androgynous names.  Our favorite right now is Avery, but I think Avery would sound best with a feminine middle name, like Elise or Isabella. If we used it, our daughter will have two androgynous names. I’m not sure if this would cause an issue for her. The other girl name we really like is Alivia (or Alyvia). I love the name Olivia, but it is so popular now and Alivia sounds to me like a fresh version of it. What are your thoughts on this name? Which spelling do you prefer? Another name I like is Ainsley because it would go great with our Irish last name, but my husband does not like it (same with Aubrey).

Our list of boy names is below:
Liam
Oliver
Declan (Dex)
Finley (Finn)
Evan
Porter
Hudson

We would like to have 3 or 4 kids.

We would love to hear any advice or suggestions that you and your readers have.  This baby is bringing so much joy to our lives during a time when we really need it, and we want to give her a name that she will hopefully one day love and be proud of. Thank you!!!

I agree: there are situations where other issues trump flow and style, and this is one of those situations. I think people can get stuck when they try to have it both ways: a crucial preference AND perfect flow / style / everything else.

I also agree that since you have a variety of names you like, it would be nice to choose one of the more obviously feminine ones with a unisex middle name. You could save Avery for a future child, or you could see if you like any similar-but-more-feminine names such as Ava or Avaleigh.

The question about whether to use a different spelling of a name will get you every answer from the entire spectrum. Some will think it makes it completely different in a positive/fresh way; others will think it’s exactly the same but with the addition of a complicated spelling issue; still others will think it makes it completely different but in a negative way. And pretty much everyone thinks it depends on the particular name and the particular spelling/pronunciation variation: Madison/Maddisynn is a different issue than, say, Isobel/Isabelle, or Catherine/Katharine. I’ve noticed a lot of negative word choices being used by both sides of such discussions, so clearly it’s an emotionally loaded topic.

My own personal opinion is that I’d generally prefer to use a common name than to use a re-spelling or alternate spelling of a common name, and that I would myself prefer to be a Kristen than a Kristynn. Others will feel THE EXACT OPPOSITE: they will FAR prefer to change the spelling of a name, and they will have always wished their own names had a more interesting spelling. Furthermore, one of my children has an alternate spelling of a common name (it’s an honor name, and we used the honoree’s spelling), so clearly my opinion is only general, and is considerably flexible.

I wonder if you’d like:

Ava
Avaleigh
Avelyn
Avianna
Cecily
Eliza
Ellery
Eva
Eve
Genevieve
Ivy
Lila
Livia
Liviana
Savannah
Silvia
Victoria
Vienna
Violet
Vivian/Vivienne

I notice that some of my favorite combinations are the ones that would give you a 3-2-1 pattern: Genevieve Jordan Welch, Avaleigh Jordan Welch, Livia Jordan Welch, Eliza Jordan Welch, Cecily Jordan Welch. I find I tend to put the names that end in N toward the end of my list, because of the repeating ending with Jordan: I don’t like Avelyn Jordan as much as Avaleigh Jordan, for example.

Because this is your first baby, there are some other issues you may want to consider. If you find you like antique charm AND androgynous names, it can be helpful to think through the subject before choosing any names: would you want to mix them (sisters named Avery and Isabella, for example) and, if not, which style would you prefer to allow to dominate? One good way to mix styles is to do first names in one style and middle names in another; since your first daughter will have a unisex middle name, a pattern of antique charm first name + unisex middle name might work beautifully.

I also think it’s useful to consider ahead of time which names might rule out other names. If you use Alivia this time, will you still want to use Avery later, or would those two names be too similar in sound? If you use Alivia, would you still be able to use Oliver for a future boy? If not, it’s a good time to think about which name you’d prefer to use.

 

 

Name update! S. writes:

Thank you to you and your readers for your advice back in October regarding the name of our baby girl. In the end, we chose a name that you suggested to us! We had not considered it previously, but it ended up being the perfect name for our girl and goes wonderfully with her honor middle name. Violet Jiord@n Welch was born on March 10 and we could not be more in love with her or her name!

Thank you again!