Author Archives: Swistle

Baby Boy Jelens

F. writes:

We are expecting our first child, a boy, the first week of August, in less than a month. He is still nameless, and this starting to worry both my husband and I.

I never thought it would take me so long to name my child. I have been interested in and besotted with baby names for as long as I can remember. It’s a great honor and a huge responsibility. Exciting on a good day, and terrifying and depressing on a bad day. Thanks, pregnancy hormones.

His surname will my husband’s: it sounds like Jelens.

A few criteria: His: no L; a good one-syllable nickname. Mine: no J; something that will work (more or less) in English, German and French; not too popular, although if I fell in love with a name, I wouldn’t care.

My list has mostly old-fashioned names, some baby books might put many of them in the “Ladies and Gentlemen” section: Henry, Arthur, Walter, Willem, Casper, Homer, Theodore (Teo!). I don’t like all of these to the same degree, but you get the idea.

He has vetoed every single one of them, mainly because they’re “old man names”. (Which they’re not!)

He likes:

Joshua

Zachary (Zach). I’m the one who suggested this very early on. I’m not convinced.

Nicander (Nico, Nick). This has special significance for him. I’m warming to the idea, but I’m not sold. Is Nicander strange? Or does it sound familiar enough because of Alexander, Leander? I like Nico as a nn, but that’s getting really popular.

Kai. I’m not fully opposed. We both like its internationalism and multiple meanings.

Tyler (Ty), Skyler (Sky), Ryder (Ry)… there’s a pattern here. I’m not a fan.

We both sort of like Milo, too. I don’t object to Nicander and Kai.

The middle name might be a family name, from my side or his, depending on who got more say in the first name department. We’ll deal with that once we have a first.

For reference, my girl-list would have been: Louise, Greta, Adele, Frieda, Mathilda, Camille, Minna, Agatha. He really dislikes most of these.

His would have been: Miranda, Calliope.

I know that there will have to be a compromise. Should we scratch all these and start over? I feel like we’re all over the place. Any feedback and help from Swistle and her wonderful commentators is appreciated.

 
It seems to me that men more often than women have trouble updating what a “current” baby name is. I remember Paul’s name ideas being pretty much all the names of his former classmates.

I suggest Isaac. I think of it as “the next Zachary” (and in fact it can use Zac as a nickname), and it’s a name that occasionally gets called old-mannish even though it’s well into the Top 50. Or “the next Noah”: a name that seems biblical but is in fact already mainstreamed. Another nickname possibility is Ike, which is similar in sound to Ty, Sky, Ry, Kai. I love it with your surname: Isaac Jelens. And I think it goes well with many of the girl name possibilities, in case he has a sister some day: Isaac and Louise, Isaac and Miranda, Isaac and Mathilda.

Since you like Arthur and you both like Milo, I suggest Arlo. No good nickname, sadly.

If Arlo is a little too uncommon, I suggest Archer. It has the NOT-old-man sound of a name like Archie or Arthur, but with a surname/occupational sound that’s very current. Again, nickname problem: Archie is great, but it’s two syllables instead of one.

I think the nickname Nic/Nick saves Nicander from seeming too odd to use. Another huge plus is being able to say “Like Alexander, but with Nic instead of Alex.” This is the first time I’ve encountered the name and I don’t know if it’s nih-CAN-der or NIH-can-der (I would guess nih-CAN-der because of the Alexander model), but I think I’d only need to hear it once to remember it. If I heard it without seeing it, I’d be pretty sure I knew how to spell it; I might put a K in there, but it looks more right to me without a K.

The main consideration, I think, is future sibling names: if you name your first child Nicander, will you be painting yourself into a corner? Nicander is either completely or virtually unused in the U.S. (it’s hard to tell for sure: it isn’t in the Social Security site‘s data base for the past five years or so I looked at—but that data base doesn’t show any name used fewer than five times in a year, so there could be, say, 4 Nicanders born per year and it would look the same as if it were zero), and so if you’d like to use compatible sibling names, that will present a commonness/style-compatibility challenge right away. Nicander and Arlo might work, or maybe Nicander and Kai—but probably not Nicander and Joshua, or Nicander and Tyler. If you wanted to change the middle name concept from “family name” to “name of special significance,” Nicander might make a wonderful middle name choice—while still letting you use family names for future siblings.

 

 

Name update! F. writes:

Nicander Ferdinand “Pattner” “Jelens” was born on Aug. 4th 2011.
We decided that Nicander was familiar sounding (not made-up), and the more my husband and I talked about names, the more I grew to love it. I tested it with potential sibling names, and it seems okay to pair it with more traditional names. Most people have not had trouble with it (if they do a simple “like Alexander, or Leander” provides instant clarity). Some people think it sounds Scandinavian, and our Greek and Italian friends think it’s fabulous. (Nicander of Colophon was a Greek poet and physician, and Nicandro is an Italian patron saint.)
Ferdinand is my paternal grandfather’s middle name, Nicander is his first great-grandchild and he is tickled pink. I’ve always thought that Ferdinand was a pleasing, quirky, unconventional name. His second middle name “Pattner” is my surname.
The name fits our little Nick perfectly. He’s a happy baby, and sleeping well at night, too, which keeps his parents on the sane side.
Thanks again, Swistle and friends!

Nicander

Baby Boy or Girl Guarraseemo, Sibling to Lilliana Avery

Jenn writes:

Hello!! I should have written sooner, but I don’t know – I thought we’d come to a few names on our own? But, this is not a drill… our 2nd baby will be here in 2-3 weeks; this is serious business. I don’t know how you would even publish the mess that I’m about to go through, but I’d love your help in one way or another. Even if you decide what part of my question you want to answer, I know the following is a ton. PS I said on twitter – it’s going to be convoluted, consider yourself warned – though maybe just long winded is a better description?!

Here’s our story:

Our first daughter’s name is Lilliana Avery Guarraseemo (not really our last name but close enough to give you the sound of it – I know doozy). We call her Lilli, though I always envisioned Ellie for a nickname, I know it’s a stretch. BUT L – Elle/ but since you don’t call people just one letter? Go with Elle or Ellie – anyway I’m the only one that calls her that, it never really caught on. Her name both first and middle are mixtures or derivatives of great grandmothers & grandfathers (Avery is a derivative of Alfred, for example). I LOVE the family connection, but with baby 2 just moments away, we might need to step away from that, because I need something I just love. Lily was always a name I have loved, my great grandmother, Lillian – was always a name I wanted to use. I did not, however, realize at the time how freaking popular Lily/Lilly would be – and the way we spell it kind of just happened it wasn’t meant to be annoying or different on purpose? It kind of just started to be the way we wrote it, so we aren’t really trying to take names that are spelled one way and throw a wrench in it. It’s kind of annoying considering one of things we did want was to avoid super common names (coming from a Jennifer & Christopher born in the 70s – which is everyone’s name born around then – I do believe).

Another fan favorite name was Jackson (again don’t love how popular it is) but I love the sound of Jax – and my father-in-law’s name is John – so that brought in a connection (of sorts) – and middle name to be Cole (for Coleman, my maiden name). My sister-in-law unfortunately just snagged Jack though, so it can’t be done now. But I do still love the name… for reference.

In terms of boys we were thinking: Jamison Cole (nickname: Jace) OR Owen Coleman.

I don’t know if I’m 100% on these. Apparently there is some kind of a show called 16 and Pregnant that people keep telling me about every time I say Jace… which will eventually go away – but side note, why do we put ourselves through the anguish of telling people names we are thinking?? Also, Owen is kind of popular and I would love to think of another name that ties in some kind connection to names like John or Jack that are uncommon? Although I did find something somewhere that Owen came from Evan, which actually is a version of John… which kind of in a long division/ degree of Kevin Bacon gets me my “family” connection. I could also use John as a middle name and get that connection if we need to, but not Owen John (OJ – no thanks). Owen isn’t really as long as I like a name- I love names to have TONS of nickname possibilities? I don’t know why – but it’s something I think about. That said, I am gravitating toward Owen, so maybe I’m more open to that rule than I think?

For girls, we love: Luella or Evalena.

The nickname for Luella we seem to be leaning toward Lulu – but I just feel like for our 2nd child, to have a Lilli & Lulu – it sounds like a kid’s clothing line – and for our Christmas Card we’ll all have to wear the same outfit on the beach … nothing wrong with this – but it’s not really who we are? It’s also like – can they use more than 2 letters? But I LOVE the name and I don’t know that can or want to go Ella for the nickname, again super popular? My mom’s name is Lucy, so this is a perfect connection to that. For Evalena – we love the nickname Lena… again with the L’s… it’s not ideal but I can’t walk away from them yet? We are stuck on middle names, if we use these names… though I’m open to different ones, in fact I feel like I need a dark horse to come in from nowhere.

For a middle name – I NEED some kind of variation for Mary or Claire – and Marie is NOT an option.

Names for boys & girls that we love that haven’t made the final list are:
Girls:
Sloane
Isla
Norah
Stella
Boys
Brody
Reid
Rhys
Jake
I know you said you give preference to boy OR girl name help request, but I’m not 100% on either I don’t think… and since I don’t know if it’s a boy OR a girl… I feel like I can’t choose – so if you have to choose, you go ahead and pick a section to share.

What the heck are my questions?
I basically have some names or some name thoughts, but none of them scream to me – THIS IS IT! I feel like with my first I had some strong contenders that I really thought – once we meet him/her one of these will be it – and it was. Now, I’m not sure!
I’m looking for a boy name – that is uncommon(ish), nickname possibilities are semi-important and if it had some kind connection to the name John or Joseph that would be great but I don’t think there is. Although we could maybe do middle name John in a case we pick up a totally different name.
For a girl, most certainly I need some kind of idea to tie in Mary, ideally – but not Marie. I do love Louella & Evelena as names… but again all the L’s and the nicknames might be TOO much for me so suggestions welcome.
OK – work your magic won’t you? Name my kid! (said in the same robust way as Ty Pennington in “Extreme Home Makeover” screams “Move that bus!” at the end of a makeover…

 
There are so many fun topics here, it is hard to know where to start! I will go with my impulse, which is to find a Mary-based middle name that is not Marie. Because you like Ella and Lena and Lulu, what leaps to mind is a Mary combination: Maryella, Marylena, Marylu. Depending on how far you want to go from the original name, there’s also Mara, Miriam (The Oxford Dictionary of First Names says Mary is the New Testament form of Miriam), Mair(e), Maris, Moira, Maura, Mariel, Marin, Marina. Most come from the same Latin root meaning “sea.” Maire combines Mary and Claire. I like Luella Marin and Evalena Mariel.

For the name Evalena, I suggest the nickname Evvie. It’s similar to Ellie without the Lilli/Ellie problem. Evalena Marylu Guarraseemo; Lilliana and Evalena; Lilli and Evvie. I have a feeling this name would lead to tons of cute nickname combinations: Lena Lu, Evvie Lu, etc.

To get away from names that have sounds in common with Lilliana/Lilli, I suggest Josephine. I like Josephine Mariel. This gives you the Joseph connection, but with cute nicknames like Jo and Josie. Lilliana and Josephine; Lilli and Josie. That’s my favorite solution, I think: two family tie-ins just like Lilli’s name, good nicknames but not too similar to each other.

Another possibility is Felicity (Fliss, Flip). I like Felicity Claire. Lilliana and Felicity; Lilli and Fliss. Possible problem if you end up with Lilli and Lissie.

Or Genevieve. Lilliana and Genevieve; Lilli and Evie.

Clarissa would give you a connection to Claire. Clarissa Maribel, maybe. Not very many nicknames (Lilli and Clare?), but it gets two family connections and I think Lilliana and Clarissa are very nice together.

Or Anastasia (Annie, Stacie). Lilliana and Anastasia; Lilli and Annie.

Or Emmaline. Lilliana and Emmeline; Lilli and Emmie.

Or Penelope (Penny, Nell). Lilliana and Penelope; Lilli and Penny or Lilli and Nellie if that’s not too similar.

For a boy, would you consider Coleman as a first name? I find the “mother’s maiden name as first name” idea totally charming. Coleman John, perhaps, or Coleman Jax.

To me, Jace is not a natural nickname for Jamison. After making mental note of both names, halfway through this sentence I still had to scroll back to remind myself what the full name was. If you don’t want to use Jace as the given name (Jace Coleman works particularly well, I think), Jacen would work as a full form. Jacen Coleman; Lilli and Jace.

Lilli and Owen sound like excellent sibling names to me.

Boy names with tons of nicknames are few and far between: our culture is more likely to do that with girl names than with boy names. The boy names that do have a lot of nicknames tend to be the old traditional ones that NEEDED a lot of nicknames because so many boys had that name—and they tend to still be common now, because there are so few of them to go around for everyone who likes lots of nicknames. William has Will and Bill and Liam. Nicholas has Cole and Nick and Nico. Alexander has Al and Alex and Xander and Xan. Robert has Rob and Bob and Robin and Bert. Edward has Ed and Ned and Ted. But I don’t think any of those names are your style, and/or they’re too common.

This is why you’re going in circles, I suspect. You’d like a name with lots of nicknames…but all the names with lots of nicknames are too common or not the right style. So you look for something less common…but it doesn’t have any good nicknames, or the name isn’t the right style. So you find some nicknames you like, but all the names associated with them are too common. And so on. I think there are three basic options here: (1) Choose a common name with lots of nicknames. (2) Choose an uncommon name with sparse or absent nicknames. (3) Choose an uncommon name and choose nicknames not usually associated with that name. With the third choice you will have plenty of company: lots of people are taking letters or sounds from names and making their own nicknames. You will find me an old stick-in-the-mud on the subject, however. My friend and fellow name aficionada Mairzy periodically has to take me aside and tell me gently that resisting a certain newly-used nickname is now officially a lost cause and it is time for me to stop being stubborn about it.

My first choice for you is Coleman, but my second choice is Nicholson. This adds an option 4 to my list above: (4) Modify a common, nickname-rich name to be less common. Nicholson is unusual, it makes a slight reference to your maiden name, and it has all the nicknames of Nicholas: Nick, Nico, Cole. It’s good with the sibling name: Lilliana and Nicholson; Lilli and Cole. Nicholson Joseph, maybe.

Another possibility is Wilson. Less common than William, but still gives you Will if you want it. But Lilli and Will may give you the same feeling as Lilli and Lulu. To me it doesn’t, I think because Will is one syllable and so traditional: I definitely notice the repeating -ill- when I type them both out, but for me it lands on the side of fun and appealing coincidence.

Robertson would be a more current version of the name Robert, giving you all the nicknames: Rob, Bob, Bert, Robin.

Redford would work, I think and it gives you both Red and Ford.

 

 

Name update! Jenn writes:

Hello! First, THANK YOU so much for helping me – I read through your response a few times and of course the comments. They helped us to think about different arrangements of names and keep playing around with some options. Your post & suggestions (like Josephine for a girl or a commenter saying to use John as a middle name) helped to narrow down some choices and inspire a new one! My husband threw this name out there 3 days before the big day and when we met her, we just knew it was the one…

Josslyn Jane arrived healthy and happy and perfect fit for her name! Attached is a picture of Joss & her big sis, Lilli. Thanks again!!

Josslyn

Baby Girl or Boy Biondini, Sibling to Meadow Alexis

Staci writes:

My husband and I recently found out that we are expecting our second child in January 2012. We had a horrible time agreening on a name for our daugther, but settled on Meadow Alexis. We love the tranquility and playfullness that Meadow conjures. My husband is Italian, and our last name is Biondini (pronounced bee-on-dee-nee). He favors unusual names and Italian names. I tend to like names that have stood the test of time, but that are not super popular. There aren’t many Italian names that I like, as I feel like we already have strong Italian last name. Both of us like nature names. Our dog is named Sunny, and the other top contender for Meadow was Daisy. We both still agree on Daisy, but I am afraid it may be too much with Meadow, especially since they will be 14 months apart in age. Also, the middle name will probably be Anne, in honor of my mother.

Here are some girl names that I like, but that my husband does not care for:
– Willow (husband says it is too trendy because of Willow Smith and Willow Palin)
– Eden
– Charlie (as a nickname for Charlotte, or by itself)
– Emmet (nickname Emme)
– Isabel (nickname Bell, but probably would never use now due to the popularity of Isabella)
– Gillian
– Laurel
– Vivian

Names that my husband likes, but that I do not care for:
– Shiloh
– Rain
– Fiore

Could you help please help us come up with a playful, not too popular name for Baby Biondini number 2 that doesn’t sound like the hippie cousin of Meadow and Sunny?

I think what we are looking for here is WHIMSY: nothing too hippie, nothing too staid. The Baby Name Wizard recommends sister names Willow, Ember, Harmony, Winter, and Lark.

Lark doesn’t quite work for me because of the meadowlark, but I do like the concept of a bird name. Robin is hard to say with the surname, and it’s not as current a name as Meadow. Wren is another possibility. Phoebe is subtle: it’s a bird, but I don’t think of it as a bird. But again, I don’t think it’s good with the surname. I like Starling: it’s highly unusual but I think it would quickly seem familiar and easy. Meadow Alexis and Starling Anne.

Winter works in theory, but the contrast with what I imagine a meadow being like (warm sun, soft breezes, pretty flowers) makes the name Winter feel chilly and grey to me. Summer and Autumn would both work, and I wonder why hardly anyone uses Spring?

I think Story would work well, or Fable, or Haven, or Juniper.

One of my favorite whimsical names is Clover, but I’m not sure if it’s good with Meadow. On one hand I love it, but on the other hand clover seems like a subset of meadow—like using the name America for one child and Georgia for the next.

Another of my favorite whimsical names is Marigold. This SHOULD be exactly the same problem as Clover, but this just goes to show how very subjective name impressions are: to me, it’s a much smaller problem and maybe no problem at all. Perhaps because I think of clover as growing in meadows, but I don’t think of marigolds growing there? perhaps because they both start with M? I can’t explain it.

I think the name Serenity would be great with Meadow, but I hesitate to suggest that name: it could be such an ill fit for some personalities.

I like the cheerful sound of the name Brighton, but the -on ending makes it seem masculine to me. Perhaps Brighten? Brightly? But then it looks less like a name. Hm. No, I think Brighton is best. Brighton Anne.

Sierra is a nature name like Meadow: Meadow Alexis and Sierra Anne. For something less common: Vienna.

Or Liberty: Meadow Alexis and Liberty Anne.

Piper would be darling: Meadow Alexis and Piper Anne.

Or Padgett: Meadow Alexis and Padgett Anne.

You only mention girl names—are you also looking for boy names? Those feel less fun to me: there don’t seem to be as many whimsical boy names, and the nature names seem more serious: Stone and Flint rather than Marigold and Clover.

Archer
Arlo
Arrow
Baxter
Brighton
Casey
Chance
Haskell
Heath
Felix
Finley
Finnegan
Jacoby
Keegan
Kiefer
Lennox
Nico
Parker
Phoenix
River
Sawyer
Shepherd
Thatcher

Name update! Staci writes:

Our daughter, Aria Fable Biondini was born yesterday Feb. 1, weighing 7 lbs. 13 oz., and 21″. We are calling her Fable which is a name that either you or one of the commenters suggested. We think it is the perfect whimsical complement to big sister Meadow Alexis. Thanks for your help!

Virtue Names For Baby Boys

Amanda writes:

We are pretty sure we are expecting a daughter late this fall. We have a daughter who is one named Hope Elizabeth. Our last name is Burleson. I really really love virtue names, and I just love the name Mercy for baby # 2. In case this baby or future children are boys, the only virtue name for a boy I can think of that I like is Justice. Can you or your sweet readers think of anything else? We are moving to an African country where virtue names are very common, so while I do think having all your kids with virtue names is a bit cheesy, I also love it and think it is beautiful and perfect for us.

OH, yes, boy virtue names are so sadly skimpy!

One of my favorites is Merit.

Another is August. I think of it as a month name but it’s also a virtue name: the word august means “inspiring admiration; venerable; of supreme dignity.”

I also like Worth. I think it comes across as a pleasingly old-fashioned name, like Ward.

Sterling works, too, if we think of it as referring to character: one definition of sterling is “thoroughly excellent.”

The Baby Name Wizard mentions Constant, Sincere, Reason, Truth, and Wisdom.

Or there’s Earnest: “serious and sincere.”

Or Loyal.

Or True.

Or Noble.

Or Moral.

Or Reliance, which sounds a little like the more common name Riley.

Pax might work: it’s a word for peace. However, it’s generally used for IMPOSED peace—the kind of peace a stronger country forces on a weaker one (Pax Britannica, Pax Romana). On the other hand, I find that doesn’t keep me from thinking of the word as meaning the regular kind of peace, and the Britannica/Romana addition being the part that makes it forced.

I also suggest Able. There could be some spelling issues because of confusion with the name Abel—but my guess is that the little Abels out there get misspelled as Able, too.

I’m not sure how far you want to drift from mainstream names, but Benevolent is a great virtue name, and has the more familiar nickname Ben if needed. Or Philanthropy, with Phil? I don’t know, these might be getting a little close to names like Peace-That-Passeth-Understanding Jones.

Can you think of more boy virtue names to add to our list?

Plural Sounding Baby Names / Names Ending in S

Jenni writes:

This is not a specific name same request as I already named my baby. I still enjoy reading your blog and wonder if some other readers might benefit from this request. When I was pregnant, I gravitated toward names ending in “S” that are “plural-sounding.” A few examples would be Brooks, Jackson nn Jacks/Jax, Collins, Wells. Many of these are surnames. I find that the plural sound gives a unique quality to a more common name without making it too unfamiliar. I just found it extremely difficult to come up with realistic names that sounded pleasing with the plural-sounding criteria. I would love to hear suggestions for these type of names. Maybe your readers will, too.

 
At first I thought this was going to be a matter of entering “names that end in S” into one of those irritating baby name sites that only gives search results ten names at a time—but it quickly turned out that wouldn’t work at all. Names like Carys and Atticus end in S, but they’re not plural-sounding in the same way as your examples.

…Well, or maybe they are. No, wait, they’re not, and I think I know why: I think to be “plural-sounding,” there needs to be a “singular” form (even if that singular is not used as a name, as in Wells/Well). So Collins is plural-sounding because Collin sounds singular; Jacks/Jax is plural-sounding because Jack sounds singular. Atticus is not plural-sounding because there’s nothing that seems like the singular form. Carys could go either way: Cara would be a singular-sounding version, but that still doesn’t make Carys sound plural to me.

What about names such as Miles and Charles and James? I mention them in my post explaining how to make names ending in S possessive (don’t be like my old co-worker who labeled a daycare cubby “Jame’s Cubby”), but I’m not sure they’re the sort of names you mean.

A name I recently thought of is Roberts. We were working on a post where Roberts was the mother’s maiden name, but she was going to use Robert for her son; it occurred to me that Roberts might be a pleasingly fresher version (as well as being her actual name), and fit in well with other current surname names.

I think Williams would work, too: it takes the fairly common traditional first name William and turns it into an unusual surname name.

Jacobs, too. In fact, as I go down the list of boy names, I see a lot of possibilities:

Aarons
Abrams
Adams
Andrews
Banks
Daniels
Edwards
Evans
Fredericks
Hughes
Isaacs (nickname Zax)
Jacobs
Jeffries
Marks (though I might avoid, because of Marx)
Matthews
Michaels (the craft store eliminates this one for me)
Owens
Peters
Phillips (the screwdriver might put me off of this one)
Roberts
Stevens/Stephens
Williams

It seems to me that one key is finding names that are actual surnames: Andrews works, but Joshuas doesn’t. Daniels works; Dylans doesn’t. I think such names are particularly charming when they in fact ARE a family surname.

Names that are not quite what I was looking for but thought might have a similar appeal:

Anders
Baxter (Bax)
Davis
Dexter (Dex)
Ellis
Forbes
Harris
Hayes
Hollis
Jones
Lars
Lennox
Louis/Lewis
Marcus
Paxton (Pax)

Can you think of more names like these to add to our list?

Revised Edition

Good news! Amazon.com’s listing for The Baby Name Wizard now includes a product picture that shows the pink dot: that is, it shows the updated 2009 version, rather than the original 2005 version.

BNW2

This means it’s now completely safe to order—though as you can see, I took a screen shot first just to be sure: back when the revised version first came out, Amazon used that picture but then changed it when everyone started complaining bitterly about receiving the non-revised edition. It sure is hard to say to a customer service person that “it WAS the other picture BEFORE!!”

But anyway, if you were to order it now and receive the unrevised version, the purchase would fall under Amazon’s return policy: you’d get the price of the book and shipping refunded to you, as well as the cost of return shipping. But the fact that they’ve changed the photo makes it likely this wouldn’t be necessary. I might have to order a back-up for my replacement copy.

(Are you secretly hoping, as I am, that there will be another revision soon? Perhaps in 2013!)

Baby Naming Issue: Using a Name After Its Peak

Allyson writes:

What is your opinion on using names that may be on their way out? I tend to like fairly “normal” names in the top 100, if not the top 50. There has been a name I have liked since the mid-80s, when a friend of a friend had it. The name is Mackenzie. Back then it was really uncommon, barely in the top 500. It slowly saw a rise in popularity and peaked in 2001, and is now slowly becoming less popular (but still safely in the top 100). I still love this name and it is one of my top baby names for a girl.

I don’t care all that much about how trendy a name is, I just care if I like it. But for some reason it bothers me that I would be using this name 10+ years after it was “in.” Like naming a baby girl “Jennifer” even though she was born in 1995. I also think part of the problem is that Mackenzie seems more popular than it is or ever was…maybe because of the upswing of Kinley/Kenzie/McNames?

What do you think? It’s one of the only girl names my fiance and I agree on…and even though I love LOVE it, I have a slight bit of hesitation due to it seeming like it’s past its prime.

Thanks!

 
As a name hobbyist, I definitely notice myself reacting in the way you describe: I’ll hear of a baby born in 2011 named, say, Madison and I DO catch myself BRIEFLY having a reaction that could be transcribed as “Really??” Which is an obnoxious reaction for me to have, for two reasons:

1. Because the name Madison is still in the Top Ten, so I should not be/act surprised that I would still be encountering them regularly—especially considering my DEEPLY-FELT baby-naming philosophy that The Top 10 is Not the Kiss of Death. I PUSH people not to rule out names just because of popularity; I feel STRONGLY that it’s an issue that should be considered but shouldn’t be some sort of arbitrary deal-breaker (“It’s our favorite name in the whole world AND it’s my beloved grandmother’s name AND my grandmother passed away on the day the baby was born—but we can’t use it because we’re not using any name in the Top 100 and it’s #96!”).

2. Because that reaction is totally obnoxious in EVERY situation where a person who is a hobbyist acts all disdainful of other people’s choices. I HATE when someone who likes fashion is all, “NOBODY is wearing that style anymore” or “MOM JEANS.” I HATE when a celebrity magazine mocks a celebrity for re-wearing an outfit. I HATE when someone makes a scoffy sound because someone has the point-three version of an electronic device instead of the point-four version. I hate when ANYONE acts as if only the NEWEST COOLEST FRESHEST has any merit at all—and it only counts as “newest/coolest/freshest” if no one else has discovered it yet. I remember seeing some program on how colors are chosen for each new season of clothes/make-up, and one of the nasty design people said something like, “By the time you know it’s in style, it’s NOT anymore” and I thought, “Oh yes? Well then, screw that game.” And normally I am much more of a lady with my language.

I think the newest/coolest/freshest is particularly damaging in the world of baby names, where, unlike a pair of shoes you can donate and replace, a child’s name is permanent. We get so many emails here saying things like “Our first child’s name was UNHEARD OF when WE used it, but now it’s EVERYWHERE”—with the implication that other people ruined the name by using it, and so now the parents are unhappy with it, even though they used to love it.

No. No no no. Names should not be chosen with the “By the time you know it’s in style, it’s NOT anymore” method. Names can be chosen in many ways and for many reasons, but that one is sheer folly—not only because a child’s name is not this season’s fashion accessory nor a way to make the users seem cooler than other people, but also because it WILL NOT WORK. If a name is going to elicit a positive/admiring reaction from hearers, it will also be USED BY OTHERS. Soon it will be last-season’s purse, and there is nothing that can be done to prevent that. I seem to have drifted far from your question, but I’m coming back to it now: even if you switch to something more cutting-edge than Mackenzie so that the Name Freshness Police will not react to it negatively, THAT NAME TOO will drift from usage and will elicit the “Huh. Another _____” response. There is no winning the freshness game, which is why it’s such a high-profit industry.

If, however, the freshness-date thing continues to bother you, there are a few things worth trying. This is one of the reasons I like The Baby Name Wizard so much: by sorting names into categories, she gives us an easy way to find names that are similar to the names we like—but with changes such as “but more common” or “but starting with a vowel” or whatever it is we’re shooting for. Looking up Mackenzie, I see she has it in the Last Names First, Androgynous, and Celtic categories, so that gives a starting place for looking for names you might find you like just as well. Kerensa? Madigan? Fiona? Catriona? Tierney? Finola? Delaney? Ellery? Emerson? Mckinley? Padgett? Kimberlin? Waverly? Berkeley? Kennedy? Hillary? Evanie? Paisley? Brinley?

But I think it’s more likely that you would look at names in the same style categories and think, “Well, I DO like some of those—but not as MUCH.” In which case, it boils down to deciding how important the issue is for you. Some names fall (for all sorts of different reasons) on the “I’m heartbroken I can’t use it!” side of the line, and those names can make good middle names: you still get to use it, but you don’t have to worry about other people’s reactions to it. Other names fall on the “I’m disappointed about this aspect of the name, but my love of the name trumps it” side of the line. Most names have SOME downside (duplicating an initial, too common/uncommon, it’s the other parent’s second choice instead of first choice, it’s similar to a pet’s name, it’s the name of a disliked former classmate, it’s biblical/non-biblical and we wanted non-biblical/biblical, a friend just used a similar name for her daughter, it’s a bit of a style mismatch with another child’s name, the rhythm isn’t great with our surname, it makes initials that spell something innocuous but we’d rather the initials not spell anything—the list goes on forever) and yet we use the name anyway because even with its flaw it’s better than all the other names.

To me, the name Mackenzie seems like a good candidate for ignoring a flaw. It started climbing up the ranks back in the 1980s, continued to climb in the 1990s—but then instead of taking either the “all the way to the Top Ten” fork or the “dropping back down rapidly” fork, it seems to be hovering pleasantly in the 40s-70s: nicely common, but not EVERYWHERE. And names such as Kenzie and Kinsley and Ainsley and Max keep the sounds sounding current. It reminds me of names such as Mikayla and Brianna and Bailey and Morgan: they’ve lost that smack of NEW! FRESH! DIFFERENT!—but they’ve taken off their coats and hats and seem to have settled in for a nice long visit. And if your tastes are like mine, you may be hoping to AVOID that new/fresh/different sound ANYWAY—knowing as we do how unlikely it is to be an enduring feature of the name.

On the other hand, one of my children has a name that had a path similar to Mackenzie’s: when we used it, it had been quite popular for two decades and was finally drifting down in the ranks. But then instead of continuing to hover there, it has taken several LARGE steps down—and we’ve gotten the occasional reaction to the name that tells us we used it past its freshness date. It DOES bother me a little. Not a lot, but a little. It’s not that I want to change his name (as with most names, it now seems to us it’s The Only Name He Could Possibly Be), but I do wish it didn’t have that one flaw. On the other hand, I feel like we were prepared for that when we used it, which makes a huge difference: I think it’s only the people who go into such a thing unaware who are severely disappointed. You DO know about it, so if you choose to go ahead with it anyway, I’d predict that you’d have similar feelings to mine: still occasionally feeling a little disappointed that the name was past its peak when we used it, but loving the name anyway and not feeling like the issue is a HUGE issue.

Baby Naming Issue: Can a Fourth Initial Save the Other Three?

Cara writes:

I have a somewhat general question (with ulterior motives) for you and the lovely commenters. It’s clear to me that certain combinations of initials are best avoided, but when we discuss this issue we most often talk about names that result in three initials. What about names that have four initials (or, presumably, more)? If three of the initials spell something that we would avoid if there were only three initials, can the fourth initial fix the problem? Does it depend on the choice of the fourth initial or do we always see the three letters that we’re trying to avoid?

A mild example:

SAG seems best avoided. But what about JSAG or RSAG?

If you think the fourth initial solves the problem, would it also apply to a set of letters that spelled something more extreme?

I’m asking, of course, because my husband and I have been leaning toward a middle name that would give our child (due in a little over two weeks) the last three initials of FKR and I’m wondering if there’s any way to salvage the choice or if it’s a lost cause. The placement of letters is fixed, that is, it can’t be KFR instead. Clearly the first name couldn’t start with an M. But is there a letter that would work?

Thank you for your help!

I see it as a spectrum thing. At one end of the spectrum are the initials that don’t spell anything particularly bad (ER, MD, DOC, INK), where we might prefer to avoid them but if we really love a name it’s not worth giving it up just to avoid the initials. At the other end of the spectrum are the initials that are bad enough that we have to sacrifice names we love because it’s just too awful. (Different people will have different ideas of what’s intolerable, but some of my own would be the initials from names such as Abigail Sarah Smith, Gideon Andrew Young, Sarah Isabelle North, Kiley Katherine Kingston, Finn Alexander Greenfield, Felicity Anne Taylor.)

In between the two ends of the spectrum, it’s a matter of trading and balancing: of thinking “Would _I_ mind having these initials?” and “Is it worth it, or is this just one of many situations where a name we love is out of the running for reasons that are unlucky and unfair but it’s nothing A Feeling Of Injustice can change?”

Sometimes there’s an easy fix, like using a C spelling instead of a K spelling, or using one of the two names for one child and the other name for a future child, or your example of switching the names. The 4-initial idea is another such possibility, and I’d say it sometimes works and sometimes doesn’t: it depends on the severity of the Bad Initials, and also on which name is the fourth name. My children and I have four names, and I’ve found that the first of the two middle names is the default initial for one-initial situations unless I specify otherwise. So if the name were, for example, Abigail Sarah Harrison Smith, I would still hesitate to use it—though if I were determined to use Abigail Sarah no matter what, it’s a big improvement.

In your specific example (FKR), I’m not sure. I would want to avoid those letters, but I’m not POSITIVE I would have noticed them as I’m positive I would with, say, FUK or FCK. I do think this is a situation where a fourth initial would improve things, but I’m not sure if it improves things ENOUGH. I was going to have us examine a few possibilities, but of course it’s in our minds now so I’m seeing problems EVERYWHERE! Like, if you’d told me her initials were going to be AFKR, I don’t think I would have been able to see what the problem was—but I’m not SURE, because now that I’m thinking of it I’m seeing it as “a fkr”.

I DO THINK that if I wasn’t in the mindset, I wouldn’t be seeing a problem. EFKR. KFKR. RFKR. I think these work. I THINK.

But it is a matter of the trading and balancing mentioned earlier: it IS a little risky, and what if I’m wrong that adding that fourth initial makes the problem significantly less? So it comes down to how important it is to you to use the names. (And could the K name be spelled with a C? I think FCR is a little better than FKR.)

I think we need a poll here, but I suspect many of you will run into the problem I ran into: once the idea is planted, the letters stand out too much for a detached evaluation. I did a quick poll on Twitter, but unfortunately I used BFKR as the random example—and of course I was asking if there was a problem, which tips things. To me, the BF at the beginning had my mind going in the BFF direction. The overwhelming response on Twitter was, um, a different direction. Someone had a good point that a lot of us are getting used to textspeak, which leads us to be quicker to see words in partial-word letter combinations.

In any case, about 1 out of every 4 responses were that they didn’t see any problem with the initials, and about 3 out of 4 were VEHEMENT amused/horrified responses that they DID INDEED see a problem, with further jokes suggested. But several people mentioned that if they hadn’t been LOOKING, they wouldn’t have seen anything, or that they knew people with similarly problematic initials who reported never having the predicted problem (TheGoriWife knows a FRT who was aware of the potential problem but said it had never come up).

I asked if anyone could think of a first initial that would remove the problem, and most of the responses were again negative: people said no, it was the FKR they noticed immediately, and anything else either changed nothing or made it much worse. But Dashoff suggested: “A ‘J’ or ‘R’ in front would draw me to noticing JFK or RFK instead of the FKR standing out at the end.”

After that quick and informal poll, I find my opinion is going toward “It would have to be REALLY IMPORTANT to use those particular names.” I think I feel the way Lynnette does: she said “I think that one would be a stretch to come to a real conclusion, though I will not use my favorite boy name because : FKD.”

Let’s put a poll over to the right. [Poll closed; see results below.] The question is: GIVEN THAT the parents would prefer not to spell something bad with the initials (that is, we are not voting on whether initials-spelling-things matters, because it DOES matter to the parents), do you think the initials FKR are salvageable with a 4th initial? And if so, please put in the comments section which ones you think would work.

FKR

 

 

Name update! Cara writes:

Thanks so much for the feedback! Reading your response and all the comments really helped me clarify my thoughts. I realized that I probably wouldn’t be able to forget that when I see the initials _FKR, I see a word, even if other people don’t. We decided that when the baby was born we’d decide on the first name and then deal with the middle name (expecting that we would probably have to scrap the F name and pick something else). But ultimately the whole thing was a nonissue—I was absolutely convinced that we were having a girl (I thought the same with my first and was right), but we had a boy! The F middle name we were in love with (Freya) was off the table. But you can be sure that I wrote out my son’s four initials before we did the paperwork just to make sure I wasn’t missing anything! Thanks again!

Baby Boy Tohtska

Karen writes:

I’m due in October 2011 and we’re expecting a boy. Our struggle with naming him has to do with that we’re a mixed nationality family. My husband is Japanese and I am half American and half German. Everyone in our families except for my mother live overseas, most of our family members don’t speak English. So…we need some ideas for crossover names. For simplicity we’ve decided to focus on a name that crosses over well for Japanese and English (with the hope that if it sounds good in English, it will work in German). By crossover names I mean names that are pronounced the same in multiple languages and can be pronounced easily by all parties. Our other two children are named Kai (boy) and Miya (girl…pronounced MEE-yah). Not sure yet if this is our last child, but we’re leaning toward having more. Our last name is like TOH-tska). We tend to shy away from names that have the sounds L, R, B, V or TH because those sounds either don’t exist (TH) in Japanese or the Japanese cannot hear the difference in the sounds (L/R and B/V). We’d like to have a name that’s not purely Japanese-sounding since we live in the States, so we’ve thrown out names such as Eiji, Akio, Yuji as well as names that have “ken” in them because my husband’s name has that syllable in it already. Currently we’re considering Noah and Eisa (pronounced like the name Asa) but aren’t in love with either of them. If this baby ends up surprising us and is a girl, we’ll likely name her Sofi. Girls names always were easier for us to come up with…! Any ideas would be GREATLY appreciated!!!

Baby Jack or Savannah

Rana writes:

We just found out we’re pregnant with our first child and need some help with names!!!

My husband and I both LOVE Savannah for a girl and Jack for a boy. But I want to consider other names that are maybe a bit less popular, while he is absolutely convinced we should use Savannah and Jack!

Here is our name list.

Girls:
Savannah Grace – both ADORE
Estella Grace – I absolutely LOVE this name, husband does not, but can be convinced
Ellary Grace nn Ella – again I love, husband not so much
Lilliana Grace nn Lilly- we both like this a lot too but is it too popular? Also, our puppy’s name is Tilly!
Noella Grace – I like this more every time I say it, my husband doesn’t like the No part of the name!

Boys:
Jack Benjamin – both ADORE this, but I’m afraid its so popular
Benjamin ? – we can’t seem to find a middle name for this ?
Augustin – I love this my husband thinks its strange!
Charleston nn Charlie – We both like this a lot, is it too strange though? Wdyt of it?

How much should we take popularity into account and what do you think of the above names, individually and compared to each other???
Any more suggestions based on our styles?

Thank you so much for your help!

 
This is an enviable situation: both parents are agreeing on two names they both love.

I would not worry about popularity, if I were you. No, no: stop worrying about it. These are the names you like best. Even if you liked Isabella best (that’s the most popular girl name in the U.S. according to the Social Security Administration), I would still push you to use it and not to worry about the popularity: at #1, it’s still only used for 1.17% of baby girls—or about 1 girl named Isabella per 5 or 6 classrooms (assuming 15 girls per class). That’s not too bad. It’ll vary a bit: the statistics are national, and some areas might have almost no Isabellas, which makes other areas more Isabella-rich. Maybe an area would have six times the national average of Isabellas—or one whole Isabella per class. See also: Even the Top 10 is Not Necessarily the Kiss of Death.

But the name you like is not Isabella, it’s Savannah! That was #46 (and falling) in 2010, given to .2736% of baby girls born that year. That’s approximately one Savannah per 25 classrooms. Barely popular at all!

Jack is a little harder to track: many boys are given other names and then CALLED Jack. We can estimate a little:

  • .42% of baby boys named Jack in 2010,
  • plus .56% of baby boys named John, of which some percentage is called Jack,
  • plus .58% of baby boys named Jackson, of which some percentage is called Jack.

Let’s go for worst-case scenario, in which ALL the baby boys named John and Jackson are in fact called Jack. We know this isn’t the case, but it’ll show us that the actual percentage resides at some point BETTER (i.e., lower) than that, and it will also help compensate for all the little boys who are called Jack but don’t fall into one of our categories above (for example, I know a little boy whose name is Richard John, but he’s a IV and he’s called Jack). In our worst-case scenario where all the Johns and Jacksons are called Jack, approximately 1.55% of boys in the U.S. would be called Jack—or one Jack per four or five classrooms (again, assuming 15 boys per class). And that’s IF there are way more Jacks than there actually are, so the actual situation is BETTER (i.e., fewer Jacks) than that.

Use the names you love! They are not too popular!

But of course it’s a little disappointing to have the names chosen so early when it’s so much fun to keep looking! Susannah/Susanna is similar to Savannah but virtually unused—and with cute nicknames. I love Sukie as this generation’s Susie, but don’t underestimate the vintage charm of calling a little girl Susie Q. And if you like Jack and Benjamin, I wonder if you’d like Jonathan, nickname Jon?

Now, as to what I think of the other names on your list and your style overall, I have the advice for you that I give to all first-time baby-namers: try to figure out now which names on your list are your actual style and which names are outliers you happen to like even though they don’t fit your usual style; and see if any names you’re considering would rule out any of the other names you’re considering (different styles, duplicate sounds/initials, wildly different levels of popularity).

If you have a boy and name him Jack, will that rule out the name Charleston for you later on because of it being such a different style and so much less common? Or will it be fine because you’ll mostly call him Charlie, which is pretty much a perfect-beyond-perfection brother name for Jack? If you have a baby girl this time and name her Savannah, will that make you feel like you couldn’t use Lilliana later, since they both end in the same sound? If you used Estella this time, would you not want to use Ellary next time because of the repeated initial and ella sound in both? And so on.

It isn’t that you MUST give your children compatible names—not at all. It’s only that if you would LIKE to give them compatible names, this is the moment you are setting your course. We all have names we like that fall outside our usual style (I think of them as “I hope someone I love will use it for THEIR baby!” names), and the trick is to identify those names before inadvertently locking yourself into finding sibling names for them.