Hi Swistle,
We are expecting our third daughter in December. Our last name is Loop. It creates some challenges in choosing a first name. We want to stick with something more traditional and familiar since our last name is so unique. We don’t want anything that adds to the quirkiness of our last name.
Our girls names are Emma Rielle and Audrey Corinne. We love the idea of finding another two syllable first name.
We think we have settled on Brigitte for a middle name. It’s French (my family background) like our daughters middle names and has a double consonant as well.
We’d also love to find a name that begins with a vowel like the other girls but want the baby to have her own unique initial. I love Isla but it sounds too strange with our last name….Isla Loop. We don’t like the plant reference of Ivy or the rigidity of Ingrid or Irene. We can’t seem to find anything that begins with an O or U that we like.
Other names we have considered that don’t start with a vowel are Norah, Hannah and Charlotte. We’ve even considered one syllable names such as Kate, Claire and Beth. Isabella is also beautiful but we dislike the nick names Bella and Izzy.
None of them seem like her name and I’m beginning to worry we won’t have one when she arrives.
We’d love to hear your name suggestions!
Melanie Loop
If you and I were sitting in my office in a skyscraper downtown, and the handsome secretary had just brought us coffee and cookies (I’m imagining a Pepperidge Farm assortment), and now we were getting down to business, the first thing I would try to do is find out which preferences are truly important to you, and which we could consider ditching.
Right now your naming search looks to me like a math equation that can’t be solved: “We’d love a vowel name, but we don’t want another A or E, and we don’t like / can’t use any of the I, O, or U names.” This is exactly the point at which I’d be inclined to give up the quest for a vowel name, particularly because you’d prefer traditional and familiar names, so it’s not likely you’re going to want to toy with Iolanthe and Orinthia. And then there’s the surname issue, AND the preference for two syllables, AND a preference for a double-consonant middle name. I would ply you with another Milano and suggest we start over.
You may already know that I am a big fan of sibling-name coordination. In fact, my first two children have names that are so well-coordinated, on so many levels (syllables, styles of firsts, styles of middles, number of letters, equivalent honor names—everything) that it made it very difficult to choose names for the next babies. I am very glad at this point that we did manage to break away from the patterns. At this point, no one is saying, “Wait…but the first two names both have characteristics X, Y, and Z; why don’t the other names match?”
All of this means that I am both 100% on your side (for example, thinking “Ooo, AND it has the double-consonants!”) and ALSO fully ready to talk you down if necessary (my first two are in high school now, and it doesn’t matter to me anymore how many syllables their names have).
I think there are two different paths I might suggest from here. One is to take away ALL the preferences, and start virtually from scratch. Pretend it doesn’t matter what letter the name starts with, or how many syllables it has. See what that kind of freedom feels like, and what kind of list the two of you come up with when you’re not putting the candidates through a series of filters.
The second possible path is to rank the preferences rather than ditching them, with the understanding that not all of them can be used. For example, which preference is more important to each of you: a vowel name, or a unique initial? Which is more important: number of syllables, or a unique initial? And so on. Which preferences would you be willing to give up, in exchange for fulfilling another preference? It would be interesting to see if your answers are the same on this, or different.
For example, you might decide that using another vowel name was more important than having unique initials. Unique initials was another of my own preferences when I was naming babies, and it hasn’t been something that I’ve enjoyed as much/often as anticipated. It IS fun getting them initial Christmas ornaments, I’ll say that. But for everything else I was imagining (mostly labeling issues), it wouldn’t be much harder to write ER, AC, and EB.
I suggest ignoring the middle name until the first name has been chosen.
If I were just looking at the names Emma and Audrey Loop, and I were trying to think of a sister name for them, I might suggest:
Abigail
Catherine
Eleanor
Elizabeth
Eloise
Evelyn
Iris
Jocelyn
Julia
Madeline
Katherine
Molly
Natalie
Sabrina
Sarah
Sophie
I also would have included Charlotte and Isabel, but those are already on your list. I think Nora/Norah is another good option.
My favorite option is Iris. It satisfies a LOT of preferences. Iris Loop; Emma, Audrey, and Iris.
Name update!
Thank you to all of you for your comments and suggestions, they really helped us on our journey to finding the right name.
From the moment we met our new little girl, we knew what her name was going to be…our little math naming problem had been solved!
A vowel name with a unique initial was ultimately the most important factor for us. But, our two syllable predicament seemed to solve itself! Our first two daughters look completely different from one another; so we were surprised when our third daughter was a beautiful blend of the two of them. Since Emma and Audrey both have two syllable names, it seems perfect to us that our new baby girl has a four syllable one…..2+2=4!
Plus, we love that her name has 6 letters like Audrey’s and ends with an ‘a’ like Emma’s. Similarities to both her sisters!
Olivia Brigitte Loop was born on December 20th, 2015 and took our breaths away with 8 lbs 13 ounces of love and dreams.
Sincerely,
Melanie Loop