Monthly Archives: March 2011

Baby Boy K____is, Brother to Violet and Jane

Katherine writes:

I wrote you about 16 months ago for help naming my baby daughter. I can’t believe it, but I need your help again! I thought I had the perfect name, and now that I am close to my due date I am so unsure and anxious about the whole thing.

We have a c-section scheduled for April 3rd. This is our third baby, and our first son. We have two daughters, Violet Claire and Jane Mirabelle.
We do plan on having more children. I am Katherine who goes by Kate/Katie to many, and my husband is Andrew. Our last name starts with a “K” ends with an “is” and sounds a lot like Alpaca.

Immediately when we found out we were pregnant, we started calling this baby Thomas (before we even had a confirmed gender). Thomas was not a name I had ever considered in either of my other pregnancies, and wasn’t on any of our lists. Neither of us knows where it came from, but it just ‘felt’ like our baby – so we have been calling him that (to ourselves – we don’t disclose names). When it came time to settle on a name, we both realized that we are having a hard time getting away from the name.

I had a very broken childhood home and was raised primarily by my maternal grandparents and my father. My father and grandfather (who is now deceased) were two incredibly good, and important men in my life. My grandfather is no longer living. My grandfather is Walter L (no name, no period – it is just “L” – the rest of his siblings have other parts of the alphabet, seriously) and James Leslie. My husband has a similar childhood situation and is very close to his father, James Andrew.

Family names we would like to use: Walter, Leslie, James

My biggest issue is that we love the name Walter and Thomas equally and they both seem to go so well with our families’ names. See!

Andrew, Katherine, Violet, Jane, and Thomas
Andrew, Katherine, Violet, Jane, and Walter

I feel like I will be a bit sad no matter which one I choose!

Names for the baby that we have are trying to choose from (in their current ranking order):

Walter Thomas – If we named him Walter Thomas we would call him only Thomas. My husband and I are both a bit hung up on calling him primarily by his middle name. We have asked friends who grew up going by there middle names, and they all said it didn’t bother them. We like the ‘sound’ of this name the most. Thomas Walter just doesn’t work for us.

Walter James -WE BOTH LOVE THIS NAME SO MUCH! It works so well with our family names : Andrew, Katherine, Violet, Jane, and Walter. It also honors all of the important men in our lives. For me, Walter is such a great, rarely used name. But, is Walter too much of an old-man name? Are we the only ones who love it? The other issue with this is that it obviously means we would not use Thomas – which just feels odd to us since it is what we have been using the whole time. I don’t know if this is because Thomas is the perfect name for us, or if it is because that is what I have been using and maybe if I had been calling him ‘doodlebug’ or some other name that I wouldn’t be having the same issue right now with calling him something else?

Thomas Leslie – my husband does not like Leslie.

Thomas James I am not crazy about this due to the triple ‘S’ ending – Thomas James K_____ is. My husband would use it, but isn’t crazy about it either. If we can’t get past not using Thomas and he is born on my dad’s birthday (as currently scheduled) then we might use this one.

Complicating issues for us is that the baby is scheduled to be born via c-section on my father’s birthday. This could change, of course. If I use Walter Thomas and he is born on my father’s birthday then I am certain I would feel sad not honoring my father, who I adore, in some way. That leaves me with Walter James (no Thomas).

The other minor issue is that Violet is named after my husband’s grandmother, and this baby will be named after a family member. However, my younger daughter Jane is named after a character in a book and I worry that this will cause resentment? hurt feelings? feeling left out? I am not sure if this is something I should worry about, or not.

My husband, at this point, is most agreeable because he just wants me to STOP IT and pick ONE. The only one he is not okay with is Thomas Leslie. I am afraid that the day the baby gets here I still won’t be any closer to decided on a name, or will wish I had chosen the other name.

Thank you, again, for your help!

 
It is highly unfortunate that the name James is so close to Jane: otherwise I would say that if the baby is born on your father’s birthday as scheduled, he should be named James, end of problem. As it is, we are left with using it as a middle name. Or with using your father’s middle name, which is already a significantly smaller honor/namesake—but also his middle name is unfortunately Leslie, which is no longer a boy’s name in the U.S., AND is a name your husband doesn’t want to use. This is a significant pickle we are in.

Meanwhile, you love both Thomas and Walter. Because you plan to have more children, you could choose one and save the other for a possible future boy. But in this case, my guess is that saving the name Thomas wouldn’t work, since it’s specific to this pregnancy. To me this is a strong mark in favor of using Thomas and saving Walter. It will be sad to leave the name Walter behind, but there will be sadness either way, and if you save Walter there is the chance of going back for it later.

Let’s start by assuming the baby will be born on your dad’s birthday. The only name you can use that will honor your father is James. Then let’s assume that if either Walter or Thomas must be saved for another child, that only the name Walter is saveable—meaning Thomas must be used now. This gives us Thomas James. I don’t mind the repeating S at all, I think because the middle S is actually a Z sound.

This name is not at the top of your list. It seems to me, however, that you don’t want to make either of the trades required to change it to something else: you don’t want to sacrifice honoring your father, and you don’t want to give up the name Thomas (assuming I’m right that it would be weird to try to use Thomas for a boy other than this one). Mathematically-speaking, Thomas James is the name. Violet, Jane, and Thomas.

I don’t think you’ll be sorry about using Thomas: it’s been “his name” from the beginning, and that’s a great story. I don’t think you’ll be sorry about using James: it’s your beloved dad’s name, and the baby is born on your dad’s birthday, and those are both great stories too. I think you might indeed be sorry about giving up either of those names for a name that has no great stories but is just one you prefer or MIGHT prefer.

HOWEVER: if you decide that, for example, “Thomas K___is” is too rhymey for you to want to use it AT ALL (for this baby OR for any future baby), in that case I think you should use Walter James: a name you love, followed by your dad’s name.

“Walter Thomas but call him Thomas” doesn’t make sense: it fails to honor your father, AND it adds a totally unnecessary “going by the middle name” complication. Going by a middle name makes sense if the first name causes namesake confusion (two people in the same household with the same name) or if it’s a disliked name used for reasons such as tradition—but in this case it would be merely to change the sound (not even the rhythm) of the name, and it would have the net result of totally sacrificing a name you LOVE: this child wouldn’t be known as Walter AND you wouldn’t use Walter for a subsequent son.

You could also use Walter James Thomas K___is: it uses all three of the names you don’t want to give up.

I don’t think you need to worry about Jane feeling left out or hurt. Or perhaps I should say it this way: I don’t think you should sacrifice your desire to honor important family members only for the sake of the off-chance that doing so will cause a potential negative emotion in an already-named child. Jane has a good naming story too, and perhaps a future child will “even things out” by also receiving a non-family name.

Apology

I apologize if you see an annoying text-covering ad at this site today. I opted out of that campaign, but there was a little mix-up. BlogHer is working to fix it as soon as possible. It will go away after less than 10 seconds, and there’s a “close” button to the upper right (off of the ad, and a little hard to see against the blue background).

Baby Boy J. (Rhymes With Bronson)

E. writes:

We are due 4/2/11 with our first child, a boy. We are still struggling finding some names that fit our child. I tend to like vintage names while my husband tends to like modern ones.

Some names we have put on our short-list are:

Henry
Nicholas
Emmett
Samuel
Patrick

We hesitate to use Henry because of its popularity. With our VERY most common name, rhymes with Bronson, I fear Baby Henry would be one of thousands.
I really like Nicholas, nn Cole, and it doesn’t seem as popular as the Henrys will be.
Emmett is one we just recently fell upon, but my name is very similar- sounds like Em-uh
Samuel seems over-used, especially in our town. Loads of Sams seem to be at the preschool these days.
And Patrick gives a nice nod to our love of Ireland. We traveled there last year just before getting pregnant. But there are no nice nicknames. Paddy, Pat and Rick just seem uncolorful.

The middle name would possibly be my maiden name, 2- syllable word starting with T and ending in M. It’s a nice gender neutral name.

Other names that I love but haven’t convinced husband about:
Alfred
Dock (family name and means 7th son of 7th son, does not appear on most baby name sites at all)
Curtis
Graham

My husband likes these, and I will never agree to them:
Carrick
Riley
Jude

Can you help us come up with some alternatives for our short-list? We plan to name the baby after we meet him, but it would be grand to have a few more names to choose from, seeing as we are so undecided about any one of them.

Thanks so much!

It is true I had male friends AND a brother so my associative powers might be uncommonly attuned, but I caution against Dock J___son: with a surname that can be used as a slang term for a Certain Male Part, I would avoid a first name that rhymes with another slang term for the same Part—especially when the whole name together, if it were Doc instead of Dock, is the name of a company that sells a Certain Variety of Adult Product.

It’s hard to compare the popularity of Henry and Nicholas: Henry is #71 and rising; Nicholas is #32 and falling after spending a decade in the Top 10. Samuel is #27 and holding pretty steady.

I wonder if you’d like other Irish names? Another name that reminds you of your trip, maybe? Or: Brody, Connor, Corbin, Declan, Eamon, Evan, Finian, Flynn, Garrett, Grady, Ian, Keegan, Lorcan, Neil, Nolan, Owen, Riordan, Ronan, Tiernan. Do you like Riley any better if it’s Rylan, or if it’s spelled Reilly? Or Carrick better if it were Cormac or Kendric?

Since you like Emmett but it’s similar to your name, I wonder if you’d like Everett instead? I love that name, and I think it’s so dignified with your surname. I also love Elliot.

Since you like Alfred and he likes Carrick, would you like Frederick? I love that one, too, and think it’s so underused.

Name update! E. writes:

We had our Baby Boy on March 31, 2011. We named him Andrew Porter. My husband never could come around to our top picks, so he chose Andrew out of the baby name book, and I chose Porter from the book as well. Neither has any family significance, but he definitely looks like a Drew.

Baby Boy Chapman, Brother to Grey

Cassie writes:

I’m so excited to get your opinion because my husband and I cannot agree on anything. Our last name is Chapman, and our son’s due date is April 2. However, my first son was born almost 4 weeks early so we’re thinking it will be sometime in March. Our first son is Grey Toban. We love Grey’s name and knew early on this was the only contender. Toban is my father-in-law’s name, so this started the concept of using a family name for the middle name. So, the only thing we can agree on this time is that the new baby’s middle name will be Thomas after my father, ________ Thomas Chapman.

Both my husband and I like less common names, as we do not want our child to be in a class with four other children with the same name. However, my husband loves older names, names that remind me of old men. He also loves “Branch”, which I don’t even think is a name.

Here are his favorites.

Branch
Jimmy
Edmond
Gordon

I like quite a few more names, as I keep trying to come up with something that we both love, but he’s got his mind set that unless I go with one of the names above he’s just going to be settling.

Liam, was my number one choice early on, but I’ve decided this is way to popular.
Haden, was actually a name Tim came up with, and we both liked, but it’s kind of fizzeled.
Emerson, was the same situation as Haden
Julian (Tim and his family do not like.)
Max or Maxwell

After reading a few of your blogs I really like the names Henry and Corbin. Tim seems to be thinking about both of these, as it takes him a bit to decide whether he really likes a name.

I would be so grateful if you could help us pick out a wonderful name for our second son! I don’t want this to be just a name we settle on when we both love our first son’s name so much.

Some names similar to Branch:
Branson
Bridger
Chance
Cranson
Lance
Rence
Ranger
Ridge
Vance
Vince

Similar to Edmond:
Desmond
Edgar
Edison
Redford
Redmond

Similar to Gordon:
Corbin
Cord
Ford
Heaton
Holden
Hudson
Jordan
Lorden
Oren
Porter
Riordan
Soren
Walter
Warren

And a few more:
Clark
Franklin
Frederick
Hugo
Karl
Lawrence
Louis
Lyle
Wade
Winston

With Grey, I particularly like Wade, Louis, Redford, Clark, and Vance.

Baby Boy: Oliver, Hazen, Luca?

Adrienne writes:

I’ve been reading your blog for quite some time but never thought I would find myself in this predicament. Yet here I am! My husband and I are expecting our first baby, a boy, on April 1st. Yes an April Fool’s baby! We have some name ideas but are not feeling very confident in any of them. We like unique names (doesn’t everyone?) but at the same time don’t want people to wonder what the heck we were thinking… Because of our surname, the first name probably shouldn’t end in an “s”.

Our list includes:

– Oliver: My husband and I both really like this but I feel like it’s rising in popularity very very quickly. My husband is probably favoring this name the most out of our list. It sort of reminds me of Cousin Oliver from the Brady Bunch though. Also, is it too English/pretentious sounding?

– Hazen: This name doesn’t appear on any baby name list. This one has a special association for us. The day we were engaged we went to Hazen’s Notch (a trail/state park) in Vermont. We thought the name was so unique and said that if we ever had a son we would name him this. Now I think we’re both wondering if it’s too out there/weird?

– Matteo: I like it, husband only likes the nickname Teo but not the full name.

– Matthias: I like, husband sadly hates.

– Luca: A name we considered for a very long time but ultimately we started envisioning it more on a girl.

– Lucas: I really like this name but it ends in an “s” which would run into our last name. Not to mention it’s extremely popular.

– Tobias: We love the nickname Toby but the full name reminds us of the character from Arrested Development.

Other than the above list, we are lost! So with that said, what do you think? Any suggestions? We’re also stumped on a middle name although I think Oliver Hazen has a nice ring to it. Swistle please help! I’m a super indecisive person struggling with naming a human being. Not a pretty combo. I’m so afraid to give this little boy the wrong name that I can’t commit to anything! Thanks in advance!!!!

and:

Still no name for our baby but I am starting to strongly consider Luca again. I’m just afraid that it would be seen as too feminine despite being a boy’s name. I don’t want him to deal with “but that’s a girl’s name!” growing up and I know this is a possibility considering my husband and I were definitely thinking of using that name if we were having a girl as well. My husband’s family is from the town named Lucca in Italy so it is a nice connection for us. Thoughts?

Still totally lost and with just over 5 weeks to go, I’m trying to hold myself back from breaking into full out panic mode.

Thanks!

 
In one of those interesting baby name coincidences (as when a child is named Isadora to avoid being Isabella M., and then there happen to be two Isadoras and no Isabellas in her class), I know a little boy named Hazen. He’s been in several classrooms with one of my sons, starting in preschool, so I’ve had some time to form an impression of the name. My impression is that it definitely works (the -en ending helps it to blend in with other such names), but that it’s good to have a story for why it was chosen—which you have, as do the parents of the Hazen I know. Last year, according to the Social Security Administration, 36 boys and 5 girls were named Hazen. I’d be a little concerned that the rising popularity of the name Hazel (as well as to a lesser extent the name Haven) will affect the perceived femininity of the name Hazen.

If you like Matteo but your husband only likes Teo, I wonder if you’d like Theo? It’s given as a stand-alone name, but you could also use Theodore. You might also like the name Milo, or the name Leo, or the name Nico, or the name Hugo.

I know that Luca is a boy name—and yet, it sounds and looks feminine to me. It reminds me of an issue we recently discussed: that certain traditionally male names (Noah, Micah) have sounds and endings that would make them girl names if they weren’t boy names by long tradition—and some of these names are rising for baby girls, including Luca (72 new baby girls named Luca in 2009, up from 58 in 2008, up from only 19 in 2001 and 6 in 1999). I would avoid Luca because of this—especially with the popularity of the name Lucy enforcing the feminine look.

If you like Toby but want to avoid Tobias, I wonder if you’d like Tobin. Or Corbin.

Oliver is one of my own favorite boy names. I think it has a pleasingly British sound. It’s true, though, that it’s rising in popularity. Maybe you would like another of my favorite boy names: Simon. I think it has a similar style, but it’s hanging around in the 250s without moving much. The repeating-S initials might not be ideal, however.

Perhaps Ian? It’s such a great name, and it’s been pretty stable: in the Top 100, but not rising.

Or maybe you would like Frederick, or Franklin, or George? I think these get overlooked, and yet they fit in nicely with the Olivers and Henrys.

And if you really want something different, I suggest John. It FEELS like it’s so overused, and yet…I’ve run into as many children named John as named Hazen. This experience doesn’t line up with the statistics, but I think it was my friend Mairzy who speculated that this is because many boys named John are namesakes who go by a different name.

 

 

Name update! Adrienne writes:

Apologies it’s taken SO long for me to send an update. After much fretting and list writing of pros and cons for each name, our precious baby boy made his grand debut into the world after a harrowing induction on March 29th. I waivered on his name for a moment as he was born to David Bowie’s “Young Americans” (a favorite artist of mine for years) and almost thought we should give him Bowie as a middle name. My husband brought me back to reality though and after a couple hours of studying his face, Oliver Hazen just clicked for us. My sweet Oliver has given us so much joy these last 6 months and though I do see that his name is becoming more and more popular…it just fits him so perfectly.

Thanks for all the help!

Baby Naming Issue: Using the Name Natalie for a Baby Who Isn’t Born at Christmas

P. writes:

One of my husband’s favorite names for a girl is Natalie. I think it’s a lovely name, but I get stuck on the meaning: it means “born at Christmas,” which our child most decidedly will not be. SSA indicates that Natalie ranked at #16 for girls in 2009, so clearly many families are using it for babies born nowhere near Christmastime. But I feel like eventually the child will want to look up the meaning of her name, and finding out that her name means “born at Christmas” when she was, in fact, born in March might be a little confusing/disappointing. Do you think “Christmas baby” when you hear the name Natalie?

I think of it only in one direction: that is, if I am trying to think of names for a Christmas baby, I immediately think of Natalie—but if I hear the name Natalie, I don’t think “Christmas baby.”

Also, I’m not sure WHY it means “born at Christmas”: I recognized “natal” as being connected to childbirth, but adding an “ie” at the end wouldn’t give it a Christmas connection. I found online that the name Natalie comes from “Natale Domini” and “Dies Natalis,” both of which mean Christmas Day—but that’s because they both translate as “the day of God’s birth.” Dies and Domini are the God part; Natale and Natalis are the birth day part. So the INTENTION of the name Natalie was to have a name in honor of Christmas—but the roundabout method for doing so means that the part they ended up actually using was “birthday.”

This is one of many reasons I find name meanings (or often “meanings”) unimportant. I definitely think you can go ahead and use Natalie for a baby born in March, just as you could use Melissa for a baby who wasn’t a bumblebee, or Lily for a baby who wasn’t a flower, or Roman for a U.S. citizen, or Rufus for a baby with brown hair, or Isis for a mere mortal.