Category Archives: Uncategorized

Baby Boy Schmit, Brother to Isaac

Cynthia writes:

After reading some of the other requests for help I find myself in the same boat as a lot of expectant mothers – my husband vetoes every name I suggest. I have literally read a book of 10,000 baby names front to back, having given him an entire page full on names of which he promptly crossed off every one except for Ivan and Oscar. We have a 3 1/2 year old son named Isaac Joseph, and this new baby boy will be our last. I know people often pair Isaiah with Isaac, but we both don’t care for it. Ivan doesn’t really appeal to me – it sounds a little harsh. Oscar is OK, but we’re not in love with it. Our last name is Schmit. I seem to prefer simple names like Jack, but I can’t have people saying that you don’t know Jack Schmit. My husband vetoed Sean, Jude, Drew, and Shane, among others. Two syllables would also be ok, but nothing long like Jeremiah. We prefer names that aren’t made up, too trendy, or with annoying unique spellings – he’s already going to have to spell his last name for everyone who will insist on putting a “d” in Schmit. Unfortunately, I’ve had some anxiety and depression issues in this last trimester and don’t want my child to be affected by what I’ve been through so maybe a name that lends itself to happiness, strength, and peace would be best.

I know this isn’t much information to go off of, but any advise would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks so much for your consideration.

I suggest Ian. It’s similar to your husband’s chose of Ivan, and it’s also simple, easy to spell and pronounce, and not trendy.

Name meanings are tricky: I have a big box of baby name books, and a name that means one thing in one book can mean something completely different in another book, and another thing still if I look it up online. But I will put a few I’ve heard of here, and maybe we can get input too from people with more expertise in meanings.

If you’d like the name to mean happiness, the name that comes to mind is Felix. I’m not sure that goes well with your surname, though: Felix Schmit is difficult for me to say.

Frederick is one of my current favorites, and it means “peaceful leader”: strong and peaceful both. Jeffrey/Geoffrey/Jefferson mean “God’s peace.” Noah means comfort and peace. Aaron means strength, and it’s neat how Isaac and Aaron both have a doubled A. Gideon means wise strength. Leo means lion, which connotes strength—and also wisdom and peace, for those of us who grew up reading the Narnia books.

I suggest Milo. It means strength/soldier (for its associations with the archangel Michael) but also mercy.

Baby Boy, Brother to Naomi

Naomi’s mom writes:

I’m hoping you might be able to help us out before the arrival of our son (due date: April 5).

Our daughter is named Naomi, a name we picked because it sounded equally fit for a cute little girl and a wise old woman. Also, we are Jewish, and we liked the way it spoke to our heritage without being obviously/exclusively Jewish. Now we are pregnant with a boy, and we’re thinking of naming him Leo, which is another one of those names that could either belong on a cute little kid or a distinguished grandparent. My husband likes the way “Naomi & Leo” sound together, but I’m having doubts. First of all, even though I love our heritage and would like to represent it, the combination somehow feels TOO Jewish. Second of all, somehow when I hear them both together I just think of an elderly couple. Is this just an idiosyncrasy of mine, or will other people likely get this impression too? Other names we’re considering are Theodore (but we’d call him Ted / Teddy), Dylan, and Sebastian. On it’s own, I’m most drawn to Leo (love it, love it, love it), but as a sibling set with Naomi, I’m most drawn to Teddy or Dylan. What do you think?

(By the way, our son’s middle name will most likely be James. Our daughter is Naomi Leigh.)

Thank you so much!

I LOVE the combination of Naomi and Leo. LOVE IT. It’s my favorite of all of them. To me it’s like “Emma and Max”: a sibling set that sounds perfectly modern in an appealingly vintage way. Theodore and Sebastian are tied as my second choice. Dylan is by far my least favorite with Naomi: I think of Dylan as purely modern (no vintage feel) and a surname name, while Naomi is ancient and traditional.

Baby Boy K____is, Brother to Violet and Jane

Katherine writes:

I wrote you about 16 months ago for help naming my baby daughter. I can’t believe it, but I need your help again! I thought I had the perfect name, and now that I am close to my due date I am so unsure and anxious about the whole thing.

We have a c-section scheduled for April 3rd. This is our third baby, and our first son. We have two daughters, Violet Claire and Jane Mirabelle.
We do plan on having more children. I am Katherine who goes by Kate/Katie to many, and my husband is Andrew. Our last name starts with a “K” ends with an “is” and sounds a lot like Alpaca.

Immediately when we found out we were pregnant, we started calling this baby Thomas (before we even had a confirmed gender). Thomas was not a name I had ever considered in either of my other pregnancies, and wasn’t on any of our lists. Neither of us knows where it came from, but it just ‘felt’ like our baby – so we have been calling him that (to ourselves – we don’t disclose names). When it came time to settle on a name, we both realized that we are having a hard time getting away from the name.

I had a very broken childhood home and was raised primarily by my maternal grandparents and my father. My father and grandfather (who is now deceased) were two incredibly good, and important men in my life. My grandfather is no longer living. My grandfather is Walter L (no name, no period – it is just “L” – the rest of his siblings have other parts of the alphabet, seriously) and James Leslie. My husband has a similar childhood situation and is very close to his father, James Andrew.

Family names we would like to use: Walter, Leslie, James

My biggest issue is that we love the name Walter and Thomas equally and they both seem to go so well with our families’ names. See!

Andrew, Katherine, Violet, Jane, and Thomas
Andrew, Katherine, Violet, Jane, and Walter

I feel like I will be a bit sad no matter which one I choose!

Names for the baby that we have are trying to choose from (in their current ranking order):

Walter Thomas – If we named him Walter Thomas we would call him only Thomas. My husband and I are both a bit hung up on calling him primarily by his middle name. We have asked friends who grew up going by there middle names, and they all said it didn’t bother them. We like the ‘sound’ of this name the most. Thomas Walter just doesn’t work for us.

Walter James -WE BOTH LOVE THIS NAME SO MUCH! It works so well with our family names : Andrew, Katherine, Violet, Jane, and Walter. It also honors all of the important men in our lives. For me, Walter is such a great, rarely used name. But, is Walter too much of an old-man name? Are we the only ones who love it? The other issue with this is that it obviously means we would not use Thomas – which just feels odd to us since it is what we have been using the whole time. I don’t know if this is because Thomas is the perfect name for us, or if it is because that is what I have been using and maybe if I had been calling him ‘doodlebug’ or some other name that I wouldn’t be having the same issue right now with calling him something else?

Thomas Leslie – my husband does not like Leslie.

Thomas James I am not crazy about this due to the triple ‘S’ ending – Thomas James K_____ is. My husband would use it, but isn’t crazy about it either. If we can’t get past not using Thomas and he is born on my dad’s birthday (as currently scheduled) then we might use this one.

Complicating issues for us is that the baby is scheduled to be born via c-section on my father’s birthday. This could change, of course. If I use Walter Thomas and he is born on my father’s birthday then I am certain I would feel sad not honoring my father, who I adore, in some way. That leaves me with Walter James (no Thomas).

The other minor issue is that Violet is named after my husband’s grandmother, and this baby will be named after a family member. However, my younger daughter Jane is named after a character in a book and I worry that this will cause resentment? hurt feelings? feeling left out? I am not sure if this is something I should worry about, or not.

My husband, at this point, is most agreeable because he just wants me to STOP IT and pick ONE. The only one he is not okay with is Thomas Leslie. I am afraid that the day the baby gets here I still won’t be any closer to decided on a name, or will wish I had chosen the other name.

Thank you, again, for your help!

 
It is highly unfortunate that the name James is so close to Jane: otherwise I would say that if the baby is born on your father’s birthday as scheduled, he should be named James, end of problem. As it is, we are left with using it as a middle name. Or with using your father’s middle name, which is already a significantly smaller honor/namesake—but also his middle name is unfortunately Leslie, which is no longer a boy’s name in the U.S., AND is a name your husband doesn’t want to use. This is a significant pickle we are in.

Meanwhile, you love both Thomas and Walter. Because you plan to have more children, you could choose one and save the other for a possible future boy. But in this case, my guess is that saving the name Thomas wouldn’t work, since it’s specific to this pregnancy. To me this is a strong mark in favor of using Thomas and saving Walter. It will be sad to leave the name Walter behind, but there will be sadness either way, and if you save Walter there is the chance of going back for it later.

Let’s start by assuming the baby will be born on your dad’s birthday. The only name you can use that will honor your father is James. Then let’s assume that if either Walter or Thomas must be saved for another child, that only the name Walter is saveable—meaning Thomas must be used now. This gives us Thomas James. I don’t mind the repeating S at all, I think because the middle S is actually a Z sound.

This name is not at the top of your list. It seems to me, however, that you don’t want to make either of the trades required to change it to something else: you don’t want to sacrifice honoring your father, and you don’t want to give up the name Thomas (assuming I’m right that it would be weird to try to use Thomas for a boy other than this one). Mathematically-speaking, Thomas James is the name. Violet, Jane, and Thomas.

I don’t think you’ll be sorry about using Thomas: it’s been “his name” from the beginning, and that’s a great story. I don’t think you’ll be sorry about using James: it’s your beloved dad’s name, and the baby is born on your dad’s birthday, and those are both great stories too. I think you might indeed be sorry about giving up either of those names for a name that has no great stories but is just one you prefer or MIGHT prefer.

HOWEVER: if you decide that, for example, “Thomas K___is” is too rhymey for you to want to use it AT ALL (for this baby OR for any future baby), in that case I think you should use Walter James: a name you love, followed by your dad’s name.

“Walter Thomas but call him Thomas” doesn’t make sense: it fails to honor your father, AND it adds a totally unnecessary “going by the middle name” complication. Going by a middle name makes sense if the first name causes namesake confusion (two people in the same household with the same name) or if it’s a disliked name used for reasons such as tradition—but in this case it would be merely to change the sound (not even the rhythm) of the name, and it would have the net result of totally sacrificing a name you LOVE: this child wouldn’t be known as Walter AND you wouldn’t use Walter for a subsequent son.

You could also use Walter James Thomas K___is: it uses all three of the names you don’t want to give up.

I don’t think you need to worry about Jane feeling left out or hurt. Or perhaps I should say it this way: I don’t think you should sacrifice your desire to honor important family members only for the sake of the off-chance that doing so will cause a potential negative emotion in an already-named child. Jane has a good naming story too, and perhaps a future child will “even things out” by also receiving a non-family name.

Apology

I apologize if you see an annoying text-covering ad at this site today. I opted out of that campaign, but there was a little mix-up. BlogHer is working to fix it as soon as possible. It will go away after less than 10 seconds, and there’s a “close” button to the upper right (off of the ad, and a little hard to see against the blue background).

Baby Boy Chapman, Brother to Grey

Cassie writes:

I’m so excited to get your opinion because my husband and I cannot agree on anything. Our last name is Chapman, and our son’s due date is April 2. However, my first son was born almost 4 weeks early so we’re thinking it will be sometime in March. Our first son is Grey Toban. We love Grey’s name and knew early on this was the only contender. Toban is my father-in-law’s name, so this started the concept of using a family name for the middle name. So, the only thing we can agree on this time is that the new baby’s middle name will be Thomas after my father, ________ Thomas Chapman.

Both my husband and I like less common names, as we do not want our child to be in a class with four other children with the same name. However, my husband loves older names, names that remind me of old men. He also loves “Branch”, which I don’t even think is a name.

Here are his favorites.

Branch
Jimmy
Edmond
Gordon

I like quite a few more names, as I keep trying to come up with something that we both love, but he’s got his mind set that unless I go with one of the names above he’s just going to be settling.

Liam, was my number one choice early on, but I’ve decided this is way to popular.
Haden, was actually a name Tim came up with, and we both liked, but it’s kind of fizzeled.
Emerson, was the same situation as Haden
Julian (Tim and his family do not like.)
Max or Maxwell

After reading a few of your blogs I really like the names Henry and Corbin. Tim seems to be thinking about both of these, as it takes him a bit to decide whether he really likes a name.

I would be so grateful if you could help us pick out a wonderful name for our second son! I don’t want this to be just a name we settle on when we both love our first son’s name so much.

Some names similar to Branch:
Branson
Bridger
Chance
Cranson
Lance
Rence
Ranger
Ridge
Vance
Vince

Similar to Edmond:
Desmond
Edgar
Edison
Redford
Redmond

Similar to Gordon:
Corbin
Cord
Ford
Heaton
Holden
Hudson
Jordan
Lorden
Oren
Porter
Riordan
Soren
Walter
Warren

And a few more:
Clark
Franklin
Frederick
Hugo
Karl
Lawrence
Louis
Lyle
Wade
Winston

With Grey, I particularly like Wade, Louis, Redford, Clark, and Vance.

Baby Naming Issue: Using the Name Natalie for a Baby Who Isn’t Born at Christmas

P. writes:

One of my husband’s favorite names for a girl is Natalie. I think it’s a lovely name, but I get stuck on the meaning: it means “born at Christmas,” which our child most decidedly will not be. SSA indicates that Natalie ranked at #16 for girls in 2009, so clearly many families are using it for babies born nowhere near Christmastime. But I feel like eventually the child will want to look up the meaning of her name, and finding out that her name means “born at Christmas” when she was, in fact, born in March might be a little confusing/disappointing. Do you think “Christmas baby” when you hear the name Natalie?

I think of it only in one direction: that is, if I am trying to think of names for a Christmas baby, I immediately think of Natalie—but if I hear the name Natalie, I don’t think “Christmas baby.”

Also, I’m not sure WHY it means “born at Christmas”: I recognized “natal” as being connected to childbirth, but adding an “ie” at the end wouldn’t give it a Christmas connection. I found online that the name Natalie comes from “Natale Domini” and “Dies Natalis,” both of which mean Christmas Day—but that’s because they both translate as “the day of God’s birth.” Dies and Domini are the God part; Natale and Natalis are the birth day part. So the INTENTION of the name Natalie was to have a name in honor of Christmas—but the roundabout method for doing so means that the part they ended up actually using was “birthday.”

This is one of many reasons I find name meanings (or often “meanings”) unimportant. I definitely think you can go ahead and use Natalie for a baby born in March, just as you could use Melissa for a baby who wasn’t a bumblebee, or Lily for a baby who wasn’t a flower, or Roman for a U.S. citizen, or Rufus for a baby with brown hair, or Isis for a mere mortal.

Baby Naming Issue: Using a Namesake’s Nickname

Katie writes:

Okay, it’s officially Down to the Wire Time over here (T minus 10 days!), and I’m hoping you can help reassure me on a question that is dogging me a little. I wrote to you about this a few months ago, and since then there has been some progress. Here’s what I wrote then:

“We have long thought that if we had a girl child, we would give her a middle name to honor my husband’s aunt Jean, to whom he was very close and who died when he was a teenager. I love this idea- I like honoring the dear relative, and I expect it will mean a lot to my mother in law and to my husband’s grandmother to have their family honored in this way. The issue is this: I recently learned that aunt Jean’s full name was Regina. I’ve known my husband for 10 years and have always known her as Jean- it’s what she always went by – but now I’m wondering if it dilutes the honor of a namesake somehow to use the nickname instead of the full name. Regina isn’t our style, and to me feels strongly associated with a religion to which we happen to not adhere, so it would seem a little strange to select it. Plus, we like one-syllable middle names. So, thoughts? Is it okay to just use “Jean” as the middle name, or if we want to say that we named the child after her great aunt do we have to go with Regina?”

Since I wrote that, we’ve committed to using Jean as the middle name- and I really like it- but I want to make sure that we’re not inadvertently committing some sort of gaffe here. It would be sad indeed if, instead of feeling honored, the family felt annoyed by our use of the diminutive.

Are we safe?

Oh, what a very interesting question! I generally find myself trying to talk people out of modified namesakes, reasoning that Grandma Ethel is not going to feel honored by a baby named Addison “after her,” nor should she be put in the position of having to act as if she is as deeply touched as if the child were ACTUALLY named after her. I think sometimes such stretches happen inadvertently through a long line of “this from this, from this, from this…” where, for example, the parents say “We love Grandma Ethel, but um, we don’t want to use her name. Is there something CLOSE to that we could use?” So first they look at her middle name, which is Hester, and then at her maiden name, which was Douglas, and oh DEAR we’re not getting any closer to finding something. And so then one day while talking desperately over the issue again, they find out that the name Ethel means “noble,” and the name Addie also means noble, and so how about ADDISON! Perfect! Because they got there by such small increments and over the course of so many discussions and with such good intentions, they might FEEL as if they’ve basically named the baby Ethel. And yet I am always cautioning that Grandma Ethel might not feel the same, and advising parents to consider if THEY would feel honored if THEIR names were so changed for a namesake.

BUT: this is not at all your situation. You’re not taking a Regina and trying to name your baby Riley (same initial) or Juno (same meaning) or Juniper (after Aunt Regina AND Grandma Pearl! Two for the price of one!) or Jean (a name you prefer but she was never called Jean): you’re taking the name the namesake was ACTUALLY KNOWN BY and using THAT—because it evokes that person, while her birth certificate name would not. You didn’t even know her name was Regina when you first discussed using the name Jean. I would definitely say you could use the name Jean and say your daughter was named after her great-aunt.

As to whether the family will give this the same stamp of approval, it’s hard to say. I SUSPECT they would, and for the same reasons I give: they know her as Jean, so the name Jean is the name tied to their happy memories of her. And if anyone shows signs of bristling, you could give that explanation in affectionate tones (ideally with brimming eyes of love): that you know her name was Regina, but that since you knew her through your husband as Jean, THAT’S the name that reminds you of her.

Baby Girl Phones

Autumn writes:

We are expecting our first baby (a girl) at the end of March. Our last name is very common and pretty much goes with anything (rhymes with phones). My husband and I narrowed our list down to Emma, Kate, and Anna. We decided to knock Emma out because of the popularity factor. I realize all three names are common, but we felt that Emma was even more so. I recently read an article (on the nameberry website) about the names Katherine and Kate. Basically the article said that once you added up all the Katherines, Kates, Katies, Kaitlyns etc. (and the fact that it is a nickname for many of these as well as a name by itself) that Kate was a top 10 name. I was baffled! I totally thought Emma was much more used, but the article actually said “this is the reason you feel like every other little girl you meet is a Kate.” So, now we are stumped. Should we throw Emma back in the mix because of this or do we definitely go with Anna now? We really like all three names. But there are other names that we liked and decided against because of popularity and the fact that they might be more trendier versus classics (Charlotte and Lila for example). Can you give us some insight? Also, if it helps – we do plan to have more children and the boy names we like for possible future children are Henry, Grey, and Jack. Thanks for your help!

I’d say that if you really like all three names, and your only real issue is popularity, then you should use Anna: it’s #29 and falling. But as you say, all three are popular, and with a common surname, you may be motivated to find a first name that’s even less common.

I wonder if you’d like Emeline? I don’t know why this name isn’t more common. It’s not even in the Top 1000. I added up the four spellings that seemed most likely to me (Emeline, Emmeline, Emmaline, Emaline), and all together they bring the name to #725.

Or Annabel! This name’s ranking is deceptive: it’s at #722, but the spelling Annabelle is #156.

Or Anneliese is pretty. Hard to figure out the rank: that spelling isn’t in the Top 1000, but Annalise is at #648. I prefer the -el- myself (and TWO Ns for SURE), to avoid any unfortunate associations.

Or Annika. That spelling is at #416; combined with the spelling Anika at #533, the two spellings together would have a ranking of about #250.

Or I love Anastasia, and you could still call her Anna.

Or Anya: so close to Anna, but #363.

Or a blend, perhaps? You could name her Anna Kate Phones and call her Anna Kate, or Emma Kate Phones and call her Emma Kate. This also gives her a likely out from being “Anna P.” or “Emma P.” if there’s another Anna or Emma in her class. (I say “likely” because of the year my mother had a class where there were two Sarahs who ALSO had the same middle name—but probably that qualifier isn’t often necessary.)

Baby Boy Name Needed

A. writes:

I’m so glad I stumbled on this site and am sure hoping you can give us some ideas here! We’re expecting our first child, a boy, at the end of March. We’re having a hard time picking something that suits our varies preferences, including: not overly common; not too “whitebread” (forgive the expression); perhaps offers a bit of international or back-in-style hipness, without being too unusual or ethnic in a way that just doesn’t match who we are (or perceive ourselves to be). I’ve got an old country Jewish half, and a German half, and my husband has a Scandanavian background with some English and German in the mix too I think. We consider ourselves urban types who value the modern yet natural in our lives. Also, a bonus would be a name that offers baby/toddler nickname-ability… like Owie is to Owen. If we had ended up with a girl, we were already both very happy with the name Nadia or Nadya.

So, for instance, names we’ve liked but can’t use (because someone else close to us has used them): Julian and Luca (I know, we’re not Italian, but I was willing to overlook that for Luca). I was curious about Judah but that was was too biblical for my husband’s taste. We each like well enough Ethan but find it way too overused now. As my only back up, I like Noah, which feels like a decent fit though my husband thinks Noah is too biblical. But, I feel guilty about the idea of giving him a top ten name (I hated how unusual my name was as a child but am so grateful as an adult that it’s so uncommon) – I think it’s currently #6 at the SSA! That alone makes me hesitant to fight for the only name I feel I could live with so far. We’ve considered Sebastian, but it feels a little too blue blood or something. I’ve thought about Jude, but we’re not jumping up and down about it (and it spells “Jew” in German, which could be a bit weird for one half of my family). We recently started thinking about Noel, but since it means Christmas, and it’s likely to get wrongly two-syllabled all his life (AND, we’re not Irish), we haven’t been able to settle with it either.

Can you offer us any feedback or suggestions?? I feel so horrible not having picked a name yet- I feel like he deserves to have an identity already. I know we have time, but after going through surely thousands of names each, I’m just feeling defeated.

Many, many thanks!

Baby Girl Toast

Laura writes:

My husband and I are struggling to agree on a name for our first baby – a girl due on March 7th. Our last name is one syllable and rhymes with “toast.” I like feminine, melodic, classic names. I’d like to avoid top-ten names, but top-100 is ok, especially if they are timeless. Caroline, Natalie, Eliza and Madeline have been my top picks. My husband wants a one or two syllable name with a “hard” vowel sound and tends to be drawn to names that were popular for our generation – Amy, Lisa, Caitlin, etc. I think these names are boring and dated. He thinks my names are weird and complicated. To work with our last name, we’ve both agreed that anything that starts with “k”, ends in “y” or has a prominent “s” sound (like Alyssa) is out. But that’s about all we can agree on. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

This is tricky: based on what you and your husband each want, my plan would be to make a list of names that would be familiar to him, but that wouldn’t feel to you like they were already used up by our generation. But–that’s exactly what your list is! It seems like it would be perfect: familiar names that were used by people our age, but that still feel fresh enough to use now. So why doesn’t he like them? If he thinks a name like Caroline or Natalie is weird and complicated, I’m at a loss. Nevertheless, perhaps if we continue to throw similar names at him, he will find some he likes? But no -y endings, no prominent S sound, no K initial, not Top 10, two syllables with a long vowel—it’s a tough order. I won’t try to follow all of those, but will instead concentrate on the Y/S/K part and hope he will come around a bit on the syllables and vowels.

Anna
Bridget
Claire
Clara
Elizabeth
Eva
Jane
Jillian
June
Meredith
Miriam
Piper
Sabrina
Violet

(I had some -ia names on there—Claudia, Lia/Leah, Victoria—but I’m not sure the -ia sound works with the Y of your surname.)

I think I’d start by pointing out to him how similar some names are to ones he says he likes. There is very little difference between a name like Lisa and a name like Eliza. Same with Caitlin and Caroline: quite similar sounds.